Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8941 - 8950 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8941 - 8950 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth A. Albrecht
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9829 - 2017-09-19
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9829 - 2017-09-19
Marino Construction Co., Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
statements made by their agent or employee is a question of law that we review de novo. See Snow v. Koeppl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7899 - 2005-03-31
statements made by their agent or employee is a question of law that we review de novo. See Snow v. Koeppl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7899 - 2005-03-31
State v. Laurie J. Malone
The State argues that the sentencing court did not have the authority to stay the sentence and create “de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16171 - 2005-03-31
The State argues that the sentencing court did not have the authority to stay the sentence and create “de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16171 - 2005-03-31
Gerald Witkowski v. Barry Weber
Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11476 - 2005-03-31
Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11476 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael E. Wilson
, the application of constitutional and statutory principles to these facts is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11549 - 2005-03-31
, the application of constitutional and statutory principles to these facts is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11549 - 2005-03-31
Darlene A. Bartelt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7572 - 2005-03-31
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7572 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony J. Dentici
, 53 (1996). Whether a defendant does so is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16070 - 2017-09-21
, 53 (1996). Whether a defendant does so is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16070 - 2017-09-21
State v. Allan P. Nelson
for our de novo review. Rochelt, 165 Wis.2d at 379, 477 N.W.2d at 661. We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10219 - 2005-03-31
for our de novo review. Rochelt, 165 Wis.2d at 379, 477 N.W.2d at 661. We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10219 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey Plummer v. State
, the court is not called upon to weigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review. The inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8113 - 2005-03-31
, the court is not called upon to weigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review. The inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David K. Kalan v. Bockhorst
. II. DISCUSSION We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14372 - 2014-09-15
. II. DISCUSSION We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14372 - 2014-09-15