Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8971 - 8980 of 50071 for our.
Search results 8971 - 8980 of 50071 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the court to reconsider whether to reopen the case. In light of our reversal, we do not reach the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94205 - 2014-09-15
for the court to reconsider whether to reopen the case. In light of our reversal, we do not reach the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94205 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 47
and fitness as a lawyer, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b).2 ¶2 After our independent review of the matter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28899 - 2014-09-15
and fitness as a lawyer, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b).2 ¶2 After our independent review of the matter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28899 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(listing circuit court duties); WIS. STAT. § 971.08. Our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817815 - 2024-06-25
(listing circuit court duties); WIS. STAT. § 971.08. Our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817815 - 2024-06-25
CA Blank Order
, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective. Upon our independent review of the record, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30
, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective. Upon our independent review of the record, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
to the denial of his suppression motion fails based on a recent decision of our supreme court. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88999 - 2012-11-05
to the denial of his suppression motion fails based on a recent decision of our supreme court. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88999 - 2012-11-05
Willie M. Williams v. Daniel R. Bertrand
without addressing his other arguments. ¶2 Our independent review of the documents Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15807 - 2005-03-31
without addressing his other arguments. ¶2 Our independent review of the documents Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15807 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448141 - 2021-11-03
motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448141 - 2021-11-03
State v. Donald P. Sullivan
factor, then we must automatically reverse and order that he be resentenced. The State responds that our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10129 - 2005-03-31
factor, then we must automatically reverse and order that he be resentenced. The State responds that our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Reginald J. Humphrey
Humphrey's petition, determining that he continues to pose a significant risk to the community. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9873 - 2017-09-19
Humphrey's petition, determining that he continues to pose a significant risk to the community. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9873 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Steven A. Kofler v. Bradley R. Florence
announced in the RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS §§ 117-132 (1965). Our supreme court acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12708 - 2017-09-21
announced in the RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS §§ 117-132 (1965). Our supreme court acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12708 - 2017-09-21