Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8981 - 8990 of 51893 for him.
Search results 8981 - 8990 of 51893 for him.
State v. Charles W. Mark
violated the rules of Mark's supervision, which prohibited him from having a relationship with a woman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25744 - 2006-06-28
violated the rules of Mark's supervision, which prohibited him from having a relationship with a woman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25744 - 2006-06-28
Rodney A. Arneson v. Marcia Jezwinski
U.S.C. § 1983 suit because when they demoted him and suspended him without pay for 30 days following
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17024 - 2005-03-31
U.S.C. § 1983 suit because when they demoted him and suspended him without pay for 30 days following
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17024 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles W. Mark
to telephoning the woman twice. This conduct violated the rules of Mark's supervision, which prohibited him
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25744 - 2017-09-21
to telephoning the woman twice. This conduct violated the rules of Mark's supervision, which prohibited him
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25744 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rodney A. Arneson v. Marcia Jezwinski
they demoted him and suspended him without pay for 30 days following a sexual harassment complaint filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17024 - 2017-09-21
they demoted him and suspended him without pay for 30 days following a sexual harassment complaint filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17024 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Craig Damaske
, convicting him of one count of second-degree sexual assault, see No. 96-1762-CR 2 § 940.225(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10992 - 2017-09-19
, convicting him of one count of second-degree sexual assault, see No. 96-1762-CR 2 § 940.225(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10992 - 2017-09-19
State v. Craig Damaske
, entered on a “no contest” plea, convicting him of one count of second-degree sexual assault, see § 940.225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10992 - 2005-03-31
, entered on a “no contest” plea, convicting him of one count of second-degree sexual assault, see § 940.225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10992 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Zander was sitting in a pickup truck, and initiated a conversation with him. Zander argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849082 - 2024-09-12
Zander was sitting in a pickup truck, and initiated a conversation with him. Zander argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849082 - 2024-09-12
[PDF]
WI 41
as factors extrinsic to the plea colloquy prevented him from entering his plea knowingly, intelligently
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36644 - 2014-09-15
as factors extrinsic to the plea colloquy prevented him from entering his plea knowingly, intelligently
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36644 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the two. The Task Force outfitted the informant with a surveillance wire and gave him $200
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143174 - 2017-09-21
the two. The Task Force outfitted the informant with a surveillance wire and gave him $200
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143174 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
colloquy as well as factors extrinsic to the plea colloquy prevented him from entering his plea knowingly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36644 - 2009-05-28
colloquy as well as factors extrinsic to the plea colloquy prevented him from entering his plea knowingly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36644 - 2009-05-28