Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9141 - 9150 of 20989 for word.

GMAC Mortgage Corporation of Pennsylvania v. Michael Gisvold
, 379 (Ct. App. 1992). The word "shall" is presumed mandatory when used in a statute. WHEDA v. Bay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10943 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the roofing work took place includes an apostrophe in the word “Mallory’s,” the name of the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424507 - 2021-09-14

COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶10 (citation omitted). In other words, if those facts would lead a reasonable officer to suspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47834 - 2010-03-10

WI App 71 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP001738 Complete Titl...
not, and did not intend to, deliver on its so‑called ‘pre-approved’ offers” of credit. In other words, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63157 - 2012-01-22

State v. Marvin C. Seay
hand in hand. The remedy for a signature omission, in other words, is part and parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3432 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of any nature whatsoever, a circuit court may be deprived of competency, in other words its authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30428 - 2007-10-02

[PDF] Virginia Smith v. Terrance A. Smith
-2123 5 MacWhyte. But those two words, “MacWhyte” and “indefinitely,” are ambiguous when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2888 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. David P. Baker
. A defendant’s intent “may be inferred from the defendant’s conduct, including his words and gestures taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14053 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
for the use provision in the lease to include additional words allowing operation of a fast-food restaurant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86044 - 2012-08-09

COURT OF APPEALS
that consecutive sentences were presumptively required. Rather, the circuit court’s words expressed its view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59984 - 2011-02-14