Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 921 - 930 of 59125 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] Ralph Hiemstra v. Michael S. Damroth, M.D.
appeals a summary judgment declaring Ralph Hiemstra’s land free from any claim by Damroth under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19584 - 2017-09-21

Ralph Hiemstra v. Michael S. Damroth, M.D.
claim by Damroth under an August 1995 option to purchase. Damroth contends the option does not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19584 - 2005-09-12

[PDF] NOTICE
claim; (2) the motion to change the jury’s answer on special verdict, because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60123 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the relevant time period that would defeat Steven’s prescriptive easement claim; (2) the motion to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60123 - 2011-02-16

John P. Pappas v. Angeline Pappas Petros
that Pappas had a deed-based claim to the alley. We disagree. The testimony of James Toller, a title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4861 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John P. Pappas v. Angeline Pappas Petros
a deed-based claim to the alley. We disagree. The testimony of James Toller, a title examiner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4861 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argues the Hearleys’ rescission claim was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190152 - 2017-09-21

Edward Humpel v. Donald R. Meider
Partnership, 172 Wis.2d 660, 667, 494 N.W.2d 204, 207 (1993). In this case, a deed grants the easement. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9196 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Edward Humpel v. Donald R. Meider
, 172 Wis.2d 660, 667, 494 N.W.2d 204, 207 (1993). In this case, a deed grants the easement. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9196 - 2017-09-19

The Falk Corporation v. Basil E. Ryan, Jr.
Ryan asserts three claims: (1) that Hanson lacked standing to seek enforcement of a previously entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5712 - 2005-03-31