Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9201 - 9210 of 63537 for records.
Search results 9201 - 9210 of 63537 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
report. Following our independent review of the record, we affirmed the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29964 - 2007-08-13
report. Following our independent review of the record, we affirmed the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29964 - 2007-08-13
Amir Mahmoud v. Michael Ortiz
as promised. We conclude that the trial court’s factual findings are supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6387 - 2005-03-31
as promised. We conclude that the trial court’s factual findings are supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6387 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37917 - 2011-03-17
has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37917 - 2011-03-17
CA Blank Order
was affirmed by this court in a previous opinion. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94476 - 2013-03-20
was affirmed by this court in a previous opinion. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94476 - 2013-03-20
State v. Charles Patterson
be used as the predicate offense under the sexual predator law, “those adjudications [and] the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31
be used as the predicate offense under the sexual predator law, “those adjudications [and] the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31
Steven C. Deiss v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh
judgment. Because the record reveals that there is no disputed issue of material fact and that Webster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15447 - 2005-03-31
judgment. Because the record reveals that there is no disputed issue of material fact and that Webster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15447 - 2005-03-31
Shirley Y. Godiwalla, M.D. v. State of WI Medical Examining Bd.
a probable cause finding until the record was filed in the circuit court for its review. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24985 - 2006-05-02
a probable cause finding until the record was filed in the circuit court for its review. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24985 - 2006-05-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
David Kozlowski, who interviewed T.F. and then arranged for T.F. to make a one-party consent recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502043 - 2022-03-28
David Kozlowski, who interviewed T.F. and then arranged for T.F. to make a one-party consent recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502043 - 2022-03-28