Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9201 - 9210 of 63537 for records.
Search results 9201 - 9210 of 63537 for records.
CA Blank Order
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102015 - 2013-09-12
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102015 - 2013-09-12
COURT OF APPEALS
At the time of trial, the State filed as an exhibit an “electronically certified” record from the Michigan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26593 - 2006-10-03
At the time of trial, the State filed as an exhibit an “electronically certified” record from the Michigan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26593 - 2006-10-03
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
imposed would run consecutively to the sentence he was serving at the time of sentencing. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
imposed would run consecutively to the sentence he was serving at the time of sentencing. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bryan L. Lopez
. The Pickens court concluded that in order for an accused's waiver of counsel to be valid, the record must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4889 - 2005-03-31
. The Pickens court concluded that in order for an accused's waiver of counsel to be valid, the record must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4889 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is not the equivalent of unfettered decision making, but is to be made based upon the facts appearing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109783 - 2014-04-01
is not the equivalent of unfettered decision making, but is to be made based upon the facts appearing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109783 - 2014-04-01
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - added the decision in case no. 2010AP3015
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108294 - 2017-09-21
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - added decisions in case nos. 2011AP2698-CR, 2011AP2905-CR and 2012AP392
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107117 - 2017-09-21
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107117 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349273 - 2021-03-22
the record and briefs filed with the Supreme Court. The following table covers cases accepted
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349273 - 2021-03-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
information and information outside the record when denying C. S.’s postdisposition motion. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162333 - 2017-09-21
information and information outside the record when denying C. S.’s postdisposition motion. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162333 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
David Kozlowski, who interviewed T.F. and then arranged for T.F. to make a one-party consent recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502043 - 2022-03-28
David Kozlowski, who interviewed T.F. and then arranged for T.F. to make a one-party consent recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502043 - 2022-03-28