Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9211 - 9220 of 19290 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 9211 - 9220 of 19290 for transfer by affidavit.
State v. Phillip Green
was done here. The sentencing transcript and Green’s “affidavit” reveal a defendant who claimed self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11642 - 2005-03-31
was done here. The sentencing transcript and Green’s “affidavit” reveal a defendant who claimed self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11642 - 2005-03-31
Brandon Apparel Group, Inc. v. Pearson Properties, Ltd.
be identified) and in the Affidavit of John Kovacs, previously submitted to the Defendants. Therefore, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3042 - 2005-03-31
be identified) and in the Affidavit of John Kovacs, previously submitted to the Defendants. Therefore, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3042 - 2005-03-31
Roger T. Lambert v. Yvonne Hein
on the merits the Lamberts’ argument that the trial court improperly considered an unsigned affidavit by Hein
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12191 - 2005-03-31
on the merits the Lamberts’ argument that the trial court improperly considered an unsigned affidavit by Hein
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12191 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
20, 2006. The motion was supported by a brief and the affidavit of one of Menards’ and Zurich’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29550 - 2014-09-15
20, 2006. The motion was supported by a brief and the affidavit of one of Menards’ and Zurich’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29550 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jesus Barbary
the appellate filing fee in this case based on the affidavit he submitted to the clerk of the court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31
the appellate filing fee in this case based on the affidavit he submitted to the clerk of the court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
that Saldana received the December 12, 2003 letter from Pekin. In addition, in her affidavit submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27360 - 2006-12-06
that Saldana received the December 12, 2003 letter from Pekin. In addition, in her affidavit submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27360 - 2006-12-06
Edward A. Hannan v. Thomas W. Godfrey
,” avers Godfrey in an affidavit submitted in opposition to adoption of the special master’s report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15460 - 2005-03-31
,” avers Godfrey in an affidavit submitted in opposition to adoption of the special master’s report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Roger T. Lambert v. Yvonne Hein
the statement is made. Based on the competing affidavits, we conclude that the trial court properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12191 - 2017-09-21
the statement is made. Based on the competing affidavits, we conclude that the trial court properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12191 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Horst W. Josellis v. Pace Industries, Inc.
fees for Josellis’s frivolous appeal. The court received affidavits and billing statements from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6351 - 2017-09-19
fees for Josellis’s frivolous appeal. The court received affidavits and billing statements from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6351 - 2017-09-19
Horst W. Josellis v. Pace Industries, Inc.
amount of attorney fees for Josellis’s frivolous appeal. The court received affidavits and billing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6351 - 2005-03-31
amount of attorney fees for Josellis’s frivolous appeal. The court received affidavits and billing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6351 - 2005-03-31