Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9271 - 9280 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9271 - 9280 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
FILED
proceeding. (4) "De minimis" means an insignificant interest that does not raise reasonable question
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87583 - 2014-09-15
proceeding. (4) "De minimis" means an insignificant interest that does not raise reasonable question
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87583 - 2014-09-15
Racine Education Association v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
of deference are granted agency decisions—great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15291 - 2005-03-31
of deference are granted agency decisions—great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15291 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
magistrate” is a question of constitutional fact we review de novo and without deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103113 - 2013-10-22
magistrate” is a question of constitutional fact we review de novo and without deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103113 - 2013-10-22
Elaine Wysocki v. Town of Kronenwetter
, the appellate court applies the same methodology as the trial court, and its review is de novo. Roebke v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3794 - 2005-03-31
, the appellate court applies the same methodology as the trial court, and its review is de novo. Roebke v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3794 - 2005-03-31
County of Jefferson v. Dale W. Prout
of constitutional and statutory principles to these facts is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Krier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7601 - 2005-03-31
of constitutional and statutory principles to these facts is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Krier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7601 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 857 N.W.2d 120. Whether the facts establish reasonable suspicion for a Terry frisk is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036000 - 2025-11-11
, 857 N.W.2d 120. Whether the facts establish reasonable suspicion for a Terry frisk is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036000 - 2025-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256016 - 2020-03-11
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256016 - 2020-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and application of statutes No. 2020AP2072-CR 3 are matters of law we review de novo. See Century
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497912 - 2022-03-23
and application of statutes No. 2020AP2072-CR 3 are matters of law we review de novo. See Century
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497912 - 2022-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
violates the Fourth Amendment, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71744 - 2011-10-03
violates the Fourth Amendment, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71744 - 2011-10-03
State v. Nicholas S. Cole
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25414 - 2006-06-05
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25414 - 2006-06-05