Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9271 - 9280 of 29324 for er.

COURT OF APPEALS
promptly filed a certiorari action in circuit court. The court found that BOA erred in applying the 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35714 - 2009-03-03

Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
the trial court erred when it granted the Town of Campbell’s motion for summary judgment on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2814 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jay Vercauteren v. Rainbow Insulators, Inc.
argues first that the trial court erred as a matter of law because it was required to award attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13850 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jacqueline Dixson v. Wisconsin Health Organization Insurance Corporation
claim that the trial court erred when it found that Milwaukee County was entitled to summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13462 - 2017-09-21

Jerry Saenz v. John Husz
in Hansen is right, then the Wisconsin Parole Commission erred. If we erred in Hansen, then the commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8599 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 157
. No. 2007AP2680 4 DISCUSSION ¶7 On appeal the objectors contend the circuit court erred in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34116 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jay R. Lellman v. Annette Mott
in the analysis of the various issues raised by Lellman. Lellman contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10464 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
(THC). See WIS. STAT. §§ 961.41(3g)(g) and (e) (2015-16). He argues that the circuit court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367786 - 2021-05-18

[PDF] NOTICE
argues that the trial court erred because it did not make a finding that the witness was available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30565 - 2014-09-15

James R. Wagner v. Wisconsin Municipal Mutual Insurance Company
of Eau Claire (collectively “City”). Wagner argues that the circuit court erred by applying the “open
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15175 - 2005-03-31