Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 931 - 940 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 931 - 940 of 12912 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence P. Sajdik
agreed not to prosecute him on federal charges, but never mentioned prosecution on state law charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8224 - 2017-09-19
agreed not to prosecute him on federal charges, but never mentioned prosecution on state law charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8224 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the prosecution of Edwin Hughes, another individual who was allegedly involved in some of the offenses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903858 - 2025-01-22
in the prosecution of Edwin Hughes, another individual who was allegedly involved in some of the offenses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903858 - 2025-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
neither was prosecuted. On appeal, Godard faults his attorney for failing to listen to the recordings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66224 - 2011-06-21
neither was prosecuted. On appeal, Godard faults his attorney for failing to listen to the recordings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66224 - 2011-06-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 accomplices had a “deal” to testify because neither was prosecuted. On appeal, Godard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66224 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 accomplices had a “deal” to testify because neither was prosecuted. On appeal, Godard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66224 - 2014-09-15
State v. James M. Evers
to § 29.64, Stats. Evers argues that the prosecution arbitrarily exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13979 - 2005-03-31
to § 29.64, Stats. Evers argues that the prosecution arbitrarily exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13979 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
who prosecuted the case at trial. No. 2019AP1526-CR 4 The jury then began
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354852 - 2021-04-13
who prosecuted the case at trial. No. 2019AP1526-CR 4 The jury then began
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354852 - 2021-04-13
[PDF]
State v. James M. Evers
that the prosecution arbitrarily exercised its discretion in prosecuting him for obstructing an officer, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13979 - 2014-09-15
that the prosecution arbitrarily exercised its discretion in prosecuting him for obstructing an officer, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13979 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gerald A. Edson
of the multiplicity test concerns legislative intent as to the allowable unit of prosecution under the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8401 - 2005-03-31
of the multiplicity test concerns legislative intent as to the allowable unit of prosecution under the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8401 - 2005-03-31
State v. Virgil L. Burks
provides, as material here: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6183 - 2005-03-31
provides, as material here: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rick A. Holtz
and that prosecution witnesses were unreliable because they were drunk and told different stories—by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17829 - 2017-09-21
and that prosecution witnesses were unreliable because they were drunk and told different stories—by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17829 - 2017-09-21