Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 931 - 940 of 20924 for word.
Search results 931 - 940 of 20924 for word.
COURT OF APPEALS
to discern meaning of undefined word). ¶13 When “behalf” is used as a preposition, such as when used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113795 - 2014-06-04
to discern meaning of undefined word). ¶13 When “behalf” is used as a preposition, such as when used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113795 - 2014-06-04
William Speener v. Donald Gudmanson
meaning.” Id. ¶10 We conclude that the words “any state or local facility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15204 - 2005-03-31
meaning.” Id. ¶10 We conclude that the words “any state or local facility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15204 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
words of jury instructions are not evaluated in isolation. Rather, jury instructions “must be viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20039 - 2017-09-21
words of jury instructions are not evaluated in isolation. Rather, jury instructions “must be viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20039 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William Speener v. Donald Gudmanson
as to its meaning.” Id. ¶10 We conclude that the words “any state or local facility,” as used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15204 - 2017-09-21
as to its meaning.” Id. ¶10 We conclude that the words “any state or local facility,” as used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15204 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
La Crosse Professional Police Association v. City of LaCrosse
of the new wording.” 3 The arbitrator specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11472 - 2017-09-19
of the new wording.” 3 The arbitrator specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11472 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
to independent review. On review, the challenged words of jury instructions are not evaluated in isolation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
to independent review. On review, the challenged words of jury instructions are not evaluated in isolation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
defective” because the oath did not include the words “so help me God.” ¶2 Regarding Johnson’s first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285079 - 2020-09-09
defective” because the oath did not include the words “so help me God.” ¶2 Regarding Johnson’s first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285079 - 2020-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
that the cocaine was coming. Some time later, Angulo said his supplier “was on the lot,” or words to that effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27936 - 2007-01-29
that the cocaine was coming. Some time later, Angulo said his supplier “was on the lot,” or words to that effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27936 - 2007-01-29
Frontsheet
, 810, 456 N.W.2d 597 (1990). If words or phrases in a policy are susceptible to more than one
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35373 - 2009-01-27
, 810, 456 N.W.2d 597 (1990). If words or phrases in a policy are susceptible to more than one
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35373 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; (c) without a rational basis; or (d) the interpretation ‘directly contravenes the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812423 - 2024-06-11
; (c) without a rational basis; or (d) the interpretation ‘directly contravenes the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812423 - 2024-06-11