Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9301 - 9310 of 16449 for commentating.

[PDF] State v. Shoua Y.
that there was prosecutive merit and its comments explaining that conclusion imply a determination that the State's exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10689 - 2017-09-20

David C. v. Milwaukee County Department of Human Services
evaluations of each child. During these evaluations, Wright indicated that both girls expressed comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9166 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Brian S. Kortbein
, 710 (1982). However, even assuming that Miller’s remark could be construed as a comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14086 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
]. WIS JI—CRIMINAL 772. The comments to this jury instruction likewise recognize that “the [S]tate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393011 - 2021-07-20

State v. Samuel Arthur Brown
that the prosecutor’s “completely different” than five- or six-year comment did not breach the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16039 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 209
— that the instruction was unwarranted. The court, in ruling on the post-verdict motion, made the following comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26500 - 2014-09-15

2008 WI APP 95
for comment; (3) consideration by the Secretary of specified criteria; (4) a decision by the Secretary whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32574 - 2011-06-14

[PDF] Barron County v. Janet S.
the trial court rejected the County’s motion for directed verdict on two issues, its comments at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2625 - 2017-09-19

State v. Eric W. Raye
, the circuit court's comments and questions to Clark lasted approximately five minutes. ¶12 The circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18434 - 2005-06-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
?” Dolecki does not dispute the accuracy of the circuit court’s comments regarding the number of prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524798 - 2022-05-24