Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9361 - 9370 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9361 - 9370 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Jimmy Bridges v. Gerald Berge
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4652 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4652 - 2017-09-19
February Table of unpublished opinions
01/11/05 Affirmed 04-0810 De Ann
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35 - 2005-03-07
01/11/05 Affirmed 04-0810 De Ann
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35 - 2005-03-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
action. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo using a well-established methodology
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497943 - 2022-03-23
action. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo using a well-established methodology
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497943 - 2022-03-23
Traci L. Roberts v. Matthew A. Roberts
401, 647 N.W.2d 426. We may therefore determine the question de novo, even if the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7555 - 2005-03-31
401, 647 N.W.2d 426. We may therefore determine the question de novo, even if the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Todd Jerovetz
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Williams, 2001 WI App 7, ¶5, 241 Wis. 2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5356 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Williams, 2001 WI App 7, ¶5, 241 Wis. 2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5356 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael C. Yates
an individual has been placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14976 - 2017-09-21
an individual has been placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14976 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
a postconviction motion sufficiently alleges facts entitling a defendant to relief is reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95377 - 2013-04-16
a postconviction motion sufficiently alleges facts entitling a defendant to relief is reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95377 - 2013-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32774 - 2008-05-21
court’s decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32774 - 2008-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶33. If the circuit court determines that a new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668908 - 2023-06-20
of law that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶33. If the circuit court determines that a new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668908 - 2023-06-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113113 - 2017-09-21
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113113 - 2017-09-21