Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9361 - 9370 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 9361 - 9370 of 12912 for prosecuting.
State v. Glenn E. Hadley
are affirmative defenses to prosecution under this section which mitigate the offense to 2nd-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11146 - 2005-03-31
are affirmative defenses to prosecution under this section which mitigate the offense to 2nd-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11146 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wendell L. Gaines
for a different offense, may be used to prosecute the person on whom the evidence was found. See United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7868 - 2017-09-19
for a different offense, may be used to prosecute the person on whom the evidence was found. See United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7868 - 2017-09-19
Michael Younglove v. City of Oak Creek Fire and Police Commission
the evidence. The Commission stated that it recognized that the prosecution had the burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12531 - 2005-03-31
the evidence. The Commission stated that it recognized that the prosecution had the burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12531 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 26
$10,000, chose to settle because he did not want to spend time and money prosecuting a lawsuit. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134597 - 2017-09-21
$10,000, chose to settle because he did not want to spend time and money prosecuting a lawsuit. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134597 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robin L. Reid
of the Intoximeter EC/IR as an invalid rule because this proceeding is a prosecution for violation of a county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6551 - 2005-03-31
of the Intoximeter EC/IR as an invalid rule because this proceeding is a prosecution for violation of a county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6551 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carl R. Nantelle
challenge after both the prosecution and the defendant had accepted the jury, but before it was sworn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15889 - 2017-09-21
challenge after both the prosecution and the defendant had accepted the jury, but before it was sworn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15889 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Carneal White
sentence, was following the recommendation of both the prosecution and the defense. 3 Section 940.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15208 - 2017-09-21
sentence, was following the recommendation of both the prosecution and the defense. 3 Section 940.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15208 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 102
the defendant presents a fair and just reason for doing so, unless the prosecution has been substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32888 - 2014-09-15
the defendant presents a fair and just reason for doing so, unless the prosecution has been substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32888 - 2014-09-15
WI App 74 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP896-CR Complete Titl...
was prosecuted for possessing the sawed-off shotgun, carrying a concealed weapon, and disorderly conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113963 - 2014-07-29
was prosecuted for possessing the sawed-off shotgun, carrying a concealed weapon, and disorderly conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113963 - 2014-07-29
State v. Fred J. Odell
, Michael Evans testified for the prosecution. He testified on direct examination that he had heard a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9552 - 2005-03-31
, Michael Evans testified for the prosecution. He testified on direct examination that he had heard a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9552 - 2005-03-31