Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 941 - 950 of 68273 for did.
Search results 941 - 950 of 68273 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that plea because it was not knowingly entered. More specifically, she asserts that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82885 - 2014-09-15
that plea because it was not knowingly entered. More specifically, she asserts that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82885 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Andrea L. Propper v. Ryan T. Propper
the weekend he did not have placement, and additional hours on the Thursday before his weekend placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24543 - 2017-09-21
the weekend he did not have placement, and additional hours on the Thursday before his weekend placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24543 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea colloquy that she faced a fine of up to $20,000 when the maximum actually was $100,000; did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
the plea colloquy that she faced a fine of up to $20,000 when the maximum actually was $100,000; did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
Richard Eggers v. Cumberland Farmers Union
that the conduct of the Eggers’ attorney, Bruce Scott Johnson, did not constitute mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11053 - 2017-09-19
that the conduct of the Eggers’ attorney, Bruce Scott Johnson, did not constitute mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11053 - 2017-09-19
Richard Eggers v. Cumberland Farmers Union
that the conduct of the Eggers’ attorney, Bruce Scott Johnson, did not constitute mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11053 - 2005-03-31
that the conduct of the Eggers’ attorney, Bruce Scott Johnson, did not constitute mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11053 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frankie Groenke
of justice. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
of justice. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
argues the circuit court did not comply with the statutory requirements for granting Constance’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46877 - 2010-02-08
argues the circuit court did not comply with the statutory requirements for granting Constance’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46877 - 2010-02-08
State v. Robert J. Capps
a postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in which he contended that he did not understand the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11931 - 2005-03-31
a postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in which he contended that he did not understand the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11931 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did not inform Thomas of his Miranda rights because Thomas was not in custody. Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
did not inform Thomas of his Miranda rights because Thomas was not in custody. Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not discuss the possibility of pleading not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158908 - 2017-09-21
did not discuss the possibility of pleading not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158908 - 2017-09-21