Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 941 - 950 of 2523 for loved.

[PDF] Andrew J.N., Jr. v. Wendy L.D.
: that Stephenie loves both her mother and her father, as well as her stepmother and her half-sister
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8370 - 2017-09-19

Andrew J.N., Jr. v. Wendy L.D.
The trial court made the following pertinent written findings of fact: that Stephenie loves both her mother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8370 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as to the defendant’s guilt.’” State v. Love, 2005 WI 116, ¶44, 284 Wis. 2d 111, 700 N.W.2d 62 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64622 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that counsel performed deficiently and that the deficiency prejudiced the defense. State v. Love, 2005 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102152 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 24, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
. Love, 2005 WI 116, ¶44, 284 Wis. 2d 111, 700 N.W.2d 62 (citation omitted; brackets in Love
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64622 - 2011-05-23

COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Love, 2005 WI 116, ¶26, 284 Wis. 2d 111, 700 N.W.2d 62 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144708 - 2015-07-20

State v. James F. Brienzo
. Alex told LiftMetal that he loved “69,” which LiftMetal said was cool with him too. Alex told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3986 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and that the deficiency prejudiced the defendant. State v. Love, 2005 WI 116, ¶30, 284 Wis. 2d 111, 700 N.W.2d 62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88856 - 2012-10-31

[PDF] NOTICE
in the back seat, Becerra tried to kiss her, stated he loved her and that they should have another baby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45899 - 2014-09-15

State v. Darrin E. Parnell
that one woman was raped . . . has no tendency to prove that another woman did not consent." Lovely v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15999 - 2005-03-31