Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 961 - 970 of 44608 for part.

[PDF] State v. Glen P. Walker
in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before Snyder, P.J., Nettesheim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12515 - 2017-09-21

Eric G. Hanson v. Town of Richland Board of Review
from a judgment of the circuit court for Rusk County: norman l. yackel, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25179 - 2006-05-15

Jerry K. Saeger v. David E. Lundgren
to the Linssens was: Part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter (E½ of NE¼) in Section 31, Township 32 North
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11556 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
to the City of Green Bay and Brown County. We affirm the part of the order denying the Associations’ motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145354 - 2015-07-30

COURT OF APPEALS
based its sentence in part on an incorrect belief that Fuchs’ physical abuse of one of the child victims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132249 - 2014-12-29

[PDF] Reginald D. Phillips v. Department of Public Instruction
for incompetency or immoral conduct on the part of the licensee." "`Immoral conduct' means conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7841 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Eric G. Hanson v. Town of Richland Board of Review
. YACKEL, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25179 - 2017-09-21

William Clifford v. James F. Blask
guns for fourteen months as part of ongoing criminal investigations. Clifford has not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13854 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lyn and Stephen Sills v. Walworth County Land Management Committee
or an assumption on the part of the witness [with regard to potential future zoning change] is not enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3801 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 20
property for the purpose of establishing a “pedestrian way.” ¶2 The Village sought to condemn part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632770 - 2023-05-23