Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9641 - 9650 of 12008 for ch.

[PDF] Frontsheet
. ch. 980 (2005-06) is entitled to a discharge hearing on a petition. Arends, 325 Wis. 2d 1, ¶¶3-5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185960 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
)(h); Village of Slinger Zoning Ord. Ch. XXXI, §§ 8.01, 8.02 (1999) (hereinafter Slinger Zoning
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352437 - 2021-04-01

[PDF] Patricia A. Finley v. James J. Finley
. ADMIN. CODE ch. DWD 40 unless the court determines, after consideration of certain statutory factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4111 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Tommie L. Cole
."). Wisconsin Stat. ch. 161 was renumbered ch. 961 in the 1995-96 Wisconsin Statutes. 30 See State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16603 - 2017-09-21

2008 WI App 150
2008 WI App 150 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP667 Complete Tit...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33913 - 2008-10-26

Frontsheet
to villages and conferred on village boards under ch. 61, except those powers which conflict with statutes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77767 - 2012-03-19

[PDF] WI 65
subch. II of ch. 229; a long-term care district under s. 46.2895; any court of law; the assembly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84155 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Gordon Lynch v. Crossroads Counseling Center, Inc.
, 588 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App. 1998). In reaching this result, we identified the purpose of WIS. STAT. ch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6504 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jeffrey A. Reitz
of this state, including chs. 178 and 183 and subch XIX of ch. 180. The lawyer may practice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17716 - 2017-09-21

City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
the appropriate statutory construction to ch. 62."). ¶10 Thus, we "undertake an independent judicial inquiry
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17485 - 2005-03-31