Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9661 - 9670 of 61041 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 9661 - 9670 of 61041 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
Age of pending: County and district
Small Claims (Contested) 17 13 (76%) 1 (82%) 1 (88%) 0 (88%) 2 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 64
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty15.pdf - 2016-02-25
Small Claims (Contested) 17 13 (76%) 1 (82%) 1 (88%) 0 (88%) 2 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 64
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty15.pdf - 2016-02-25
[PDF]
Age at disposition: County and district
(100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 2 Small Claims (Contested) 82 39 (48%) 24 (77%) 14 (94%) 3 (98%) 0 (98%) 0
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispocounty16.pdf - 2017-03-07
(100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 2 Small Claims (Contested) 82 39 (48%) 24 (77%) 14 (94%) 3 (98%) 0 (98%) 0
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispocounty16.pdf - 2017-03-07
[PDF]
Age of pending:: County and district
%) 17 Small Claims (Contested) 8 4 (50%) 1 (63%) 1 (75%) 2 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty17.pdf - 2018-02-09
%) 17 Small Claims (Contested) 8 4 (50%) 1 (63%) 1 (75%) 2 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty17.pdf - 2018-02-09
[PDF]
Begin Date:
%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 8 Small Claims (Contested) 33 18 (55%) 6 (73%) 7 (94%) 2 (100%) 0 (100
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispocounty13.pdf - 2014-03-24
%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 8 Small Claims (Contested) 33 18 (55%) 6 (73%) 7 (94%) 2 (100%) 0 (100
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispocounty13.pdf - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-APPELLANT, V. STATE OF WISCONSIN CLAIMS BOARD, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531016 - 2022-06-09
-APPELLANT, V. STATE OF WISCONSIN CLAIMS BOARD, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531016 - 2022-06-09
Frontsheet
of Milwaukee (the Archdiocese).[1] The court of appeals agreed with the circuit court that the claims against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29686 - 2007-07-10
of Milwaukee (the Archdiocese).[1] The court of appeals agreed with the circuit court that the claims against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29686 - 2007-07-10
[PDF]
WI 95
with the circuit court that the claims against the Archdiocese for negligent supervision and fraud relating
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29686 - 2014-09-15
with the circuit court that the claims against the Archdiocese for negligent supervision and fraud relating
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29686 - 2014-09-15
WI App 65 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP878 Complete Title o...
(AEGIS) was barred on the ground of claim preclusion from bringing this action against Arby Construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63042 - 2012-01-22
(AEGIS) was barred on the ground of claim preclusion from bringing this action against Arby Construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63042 - 2012-01-22
[PDF]
WI App 65
Insurance Services Limited No. 2010AP878 2 (AEGIS) was barred on the ground of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63042 - 2014-09-15
Insurance Services Limited No. 2010AP878 2 (AEGIS) was barred on the ground of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63042 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that claim preclusion bars the County’s action, and affirm the order. Background ¶2 In 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34251 - 2014-09-15
that claim preclusion bars the County’s action, and affirm the order. Background ¶2 In 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34251 - 2014-09-15

