Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9771 - 9780 of 83359 for simple case search.
Search results 9771 - 9780 of 83359 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
times pertinent to this case, Gregorio Vargas was an inmate at the Grant county jail. Alan Blanchard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26853 - 2006-10-18
times pertinent to this case, Gregorio Vargas was an inmate at the Grant county jail. Alan Blanchard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26853 - 2006-10-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
and consented to a search of her garage where Slater parked a car. Damos knew that Slater stored guns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29765 - 2014-09-15
and consented to a search of her garage where Slater parked a car. Damos knew that Slater stored guns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29765 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
police of Slater’s suspicious behavior and consented to a search of her garage where Slater parked a car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29765 - 2007-07-16
police of Slater’s suspicious behavior and consented to a search of her garage where Slater parked a car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29765 - 2007-07-16
State v. Spencer S. Henderson
protections against coerced consent to a search. The statute requires an individual arrested for OWI to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5512 - 2005-03-31
protections against coerced consent to a search. The statute requires an individual arrested for OWI to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5512 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Spencer S. Henderson
), is unconstitutional because it violates the Fourth Amendment’s protections against coerced consent to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5512 - 2017-09-19
), is unconstitutional because it violates the Fourth Amendment’s protections against coerced consent to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5512 - 2017-09-19
County of Waukesha v. Robert M. Hallenbeck
breath sample by the violated PBT process was an unconstitutional search and seizure. The taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
breath sample by the violated PBT process was an unconstitutional search and seizure. The taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jill A. Moore
is correct, the conviction still must be vacated. While we must normally search the record for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7218 - 2017-09-20
is correct, the conviction still must be vacated. While we must normally search the record for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7218 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
against unreasonable searches and seizures. 5 “‘The temporary detention of individuals during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124263 - 2017-09-21
against unreasonable searches and seizures. 5 “‘The temporary detention of individuals during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124263 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the police department and strip searched. Officers observed contraband in Corder’s groin area, but due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840107 - 2024-08-20
to the police department and strip searched. Officers observed contraband in Corder’s groin area, but due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840107 - 2024-08-20
[PDF]
County of Waukesha v. Robert M. Hallenbeck
was an unconstitutional search and seizure. The taking of a breath sample is a search and seizure under the provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9876 - 2017-09-19
was an unconstitutional search and seizure. The taking of a breath sample is a search and seizure under the provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9876 - 2017-09-19