Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9861 - 9870 of 57887 for a i x.

COURT OF APPEALS
of the arousal or gratification element by his attorney. Parr’s trial attorney testified: “I have no doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109979 - 2014-04-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying Gibbs’ request for costs. I affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94975 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was informed of the arousal or gratification element by his attorney. Parr’s trial attorney testified: “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109979 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, as well as the no-merit reports, I conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235897 - 2019-02-22

State v. Frank S. Smith
I don't view [Smith] as being a victim. [Cocaine] is a nonaddictive drug that you took here. Now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=930446 - 2025-03-20

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition comments from Patel
Dear Ms. Janto: I write to address State Bar of Wisconsin Governor Steven Levine’s comments
/supreme/docs/1308commentspatel.pdf - 2013-12-03

[PDF] Court of Appeals Statistics January 2024
is as follows: JANUARY and YTD 2024 Dist. I Dist. II Dist. III Dist. IV Total Cases Terminated 41 62 54
/ca/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761822 - 2024-02-07

COURT OF APPEALS
of interest: I have several reasons for not raising this claim. First, you have told me that when you called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34523 - 2008-11-05

[PDF] State v. Frank S. Smith
. In doing so the court stated "and in this case I don't view [Smith] as being a victim. [Cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8921 - 2017-09-19