Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 991 - 1000 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Georgeanne owned a home in Berlin, Wisconsin. Terrence also had a joint tenancy ownership interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72370 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 122
by Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000), in deciding Wohlers’ motion to modify visitation; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69081 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Preston W. McGuire v. Danielle M. McGuire
provided for joint legal custody, with Reuter receiving primary physical placement. McGuire, who had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2175 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 34
“free” on bail in his 2004 case, but spent 50 days in custody before being released on bail in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31611 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in treatment of his mental health issues and pattern of domestic violence. Following a trial on the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228136 - 2018-11-20

[PDF] FA-4144: Stipulation and Order Suspending Proceedings to Effect Reconciliation
Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: FA-4144VA, 11/19
/formdisplay/FA-4144VA.pdf?formNumber=FA-4144VA&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2020-02-12

[MS WORD] FA-4144VA: Stipulation Suspending Proceedings to Effect Reconciliation
Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: 2 Petitioner/Joint
/formdisplay/FA-4144VA.doc?formNumber=FA-4144VA&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-12-07

State v. Peter R. Martel
in." The State and Martel agreed to a joint sentence recommendation of a withheld sentence and 36 months
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16639 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Peter R. Martel
agreed to a joint sentence recommendation of a withheld sentence and 36 months of probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16639 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
divided between Gaylan and Rose. The decision explained that joint custody was not contested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75827 - 2014-09-15