Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9961 - 9970 of 77024 for search which.
Search results 9961 - 9970 of 77024 for search which.
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonability and we will search the record for facts that support a reasonable exercise of discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68842 - 2011-08-01
of reasonability and we will search the record for facts that support a reasonable exercise of discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68842 - 2011-08-01
COURT OF APPEALS
, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). We may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76882 - 2012-01-23
, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). We may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76882 - 2012-01-23
[PDF]
March 14, 2011
to search a shared dwelling in Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), which states that a warrantless
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61084 - 2014-09-15
to search a shared dwelling in Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), which states that a warrantless
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61084 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
March 25, 2011
to search a shared dwelling in Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), which states that a warrantless
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62024 - 2014-09-15
to search a shared dwelling in Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), which states that a warrantless
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62024 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
December 23, 2010
. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), which states that a warrantless search cannot be justified when
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58326 - 2014-09-15
. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), which states that a warrantless search cannot be justified when
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58326 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the witness which one was the suspect—was impermissibly suggestive. It was therefore not a violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217266 - 2018-08-07
the witness which one was the suspect—was impermissibly suggestive. It was therefore not a violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217266 - 2018-08-07
[PDF]
Frontsheet
' cellphone, which McKellips claimed he dropped in a coal pit. After searching McKellips' work area
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170721 - 2017-09-21
' cellphone, which McKellips claimed he dropped in a coal pit. After searching McKellips' work area
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170721 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of discretion on both evidentiary rulings and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In April 2006, a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36460 - 2014-09-15
of discretion on both evidentiary rulings and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In April 2006, a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36460 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
witnesses. The State explained that the hospital to which Victor had been admitted “had no record of who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250353 - 2019-11-19
witnesses. The State explained that the hospital to which Victor had been admitted “had no record of who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250353 - 2019-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In April 2006, a search warrant was executed at Cardoza’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12
and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In April 2006, a search warrant was executed at Cardoza’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12