Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1491 - 1500 of 7563 for ye.

COURT OF APPEALS
responded, “The [j]ury, yes.” ¶10 The court then advised Benny that he also had a right to a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48059 - 2010-03-22

COURT OF APPEALS
house, did the police ask you what happened? [DESTINY]: Yes. [HIGGINS’ COUNSEL]: Did you tell them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59522 - 2011-01-31

[PDF] NOTICE
: THE COURT: You also understand the concept of party to a crime? DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35500 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and another person] asked you to do, isn’t that right? A. The part about the Monopoly, yes. The rest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103114 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
? A Yes. Q Was it you who decided what got written down? A Yes. Q So you decided if it’s important
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37534 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Antoine T. Hunter
to plead no contest voluntarily? [HUNTER]: Yes. THE COURT: Took a deep breath before you said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6833 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
that right. Am I correct? Benny responded, “The [j]ury, yes.” ¶10 The court then advised Benny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48059 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the Monopoly, yes. The rest, no. Q. What’s the rest? A. Whatever you’re saying I’m lying about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103114 - 2013-10-16

[PDF] WI App 33
, and after a very long pause, Tung said yes. ¶8 Tung testified in his own defense, stating that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668898 - 2023-08-08

COURT OF APPEALS
understood and Triggs replied, “Yes.” The trial court asked Triggs whether he had gone over the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125349 - 2014-10-27