Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15271 - 15280 of 20953 for word.
Search results 15271 - 15280 of 20953 for word.
[PDF]
Marjorie Leonard v. Judy R. Cattahach
the words of the statute in relation to its context, subject matter, scope, history, and the object which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11654 - 2017-09-19
the words of the statute in relation to its context, subject matter, scope, history, and the object which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11654 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
abandoned by relatives “in his hour of need.” The record supports the court’s conclusion that, in the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113844 - 2014-06-04
abandoned by relatives “in his hour of need.” The record supports the court’s conclusion that, in the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113844 - 2014-06-04
2009 WI APP 117
completion of the terms of the agreement; in other words, this provision specifies the benefit Kaczmarski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37389 - 2009-08-25
completion of the terms of the agreement; in other words, this provision specifies the benefit Kaczmarski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37389 - 2009-08-25
State v. Somkhith Neuaone
unequivocally required the State, in Neuaone’s own words in his appellate brief, “to not provide certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18913 - 2005-07-06
unequivocally required the State, in Neuaone’s own words in his appellate brief, “to not provide certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18913 - 2005-07-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that form on his behalf until the plea hearing. He testified that he did not know what the words “argue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
that form on his behalf until the plea hearing. He testified that he did not know what the words “argue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
State v. Steven S. Walter
to the defendant.” Day, 61 Wis. 2d at 244. The supreme court’s use of the word “some” signals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16182 - 2017-09-21
to the defendant.” Day, 61 Wis. 2d at 244. The supreme court’s use of the word “some” signals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16182 - 2017-09-21
Libbie Pesek v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
her from having these shoes. In other words the state was justified in interpreting or applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13456 - 2005-03-31
her from having these shoes. In other words the state was justified in interpreting or applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13456 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
but an accumulation of items” that determined the reasonability of Officer Tisher’s actions. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86046 - 2012-08-13
but an accumulation of items” that determined the reasonability of Officer Tisher’s actions. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86046 - 2012-08-13
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
that the district attorney’s office was mandated to charge Banks as a second offender under the wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15125 - 2005-03-31
that the district attorney’s office was mandated to charge Banks as a second offender under the wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15125 - 2005-03-31
Virginia Wustrack v. Beverly Enterprises-Wisconsin, Inc.
to a question relating to the department surveys. And I did note the words, quote, “Objection. Because we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15021 - 2005-03-31
to a question relating to the department surveys. And I did note the words, quote, “Objection. Because we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15021 - 2005-03-31