Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15271 - 15280 of 20943 for word.
Search results 15271 - 15280 of 20943 for word.
COURT OF APPEALS
on the words and phrases in disputed portions of statutes, courts also consider the context represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136564 - 2015-03-04
on the words and phrases in disputed portions of statutes, courts also consider the context represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136564 - 2015-03-04
The Estate of Robert Murray v. The Travelers Insurance Company
be applied, an employee must have a “given place of employment.” We conclude the words “given place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13653 - 2005-03-31
be applied, an employee must have a “given place of employment.” We conclude the words “given place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13653 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J.W.
admission, but he did write the words "I did it" on a piece of paper which he handed to the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12110 - 2017-09-21
admission, but he did write the words "I did it" on a piece of paper which he handed to the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12110 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
… or is dismissed by the judge.” This provision uses the word “withdraw” rather than “dismiss” for the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33187 - 2011-06-14
… or is dismissed by the judge.” This provision uses the word “withdraw” rather than “dismiss” for the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33187 - 2011-06-14
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
that the district attorney’s office was mandated to charge Banks as a second offender under the wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15124 - 2005-03-31
that the district attorney’s office was mandated to charge Banks as a second offender under the wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15124 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
." [2] B.R.C. moved to strike from page one of the BBE's reply brief the words "B.R.C. chose not to sign
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112193 - 2014-05-08
." [2] B.R.C. moved to strike from page one of the BBE's reply brief the words "B.R.C. chose not to sign
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112193 - 2014-05-08
State v. Jack R. Hayes
. In Hayes’s words, “the sole issue before this Court is whether the alleged errors of Hayes’s counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4784 - 2005-03-31
. In Hayes’s words, “the sole issue before this Court is whether the alleged errors of Hayes’s counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4784 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are unconvinced that the particular words used in this case constituted an erroneous exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250628 - 2019-11-26
are unconvinced that the particular words used in this case constituted an erroneous exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250628 - 2019-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. That the caller did not use the specific words “vomiting” or “sick” is not pertinent, as his description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197650 - 2017-10-11
. That the caller did not use the specific words “vomiting” or “sick” is not pertinent, as his description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197650 - 2017-10-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[or her] words and gestures taken in the context of the circumstances.” State v. Stewart, 143 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195578 - 2017-09-21
[or her] words and gestures taken in the context of the circumstances.” State v. Stewart, 143 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195578 - 2017-09-21