Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16041 - 16050 of 46137 for paternity test paper work.

Suburban Laboratories of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
injunction preventing the DNR from ordering the resampling of certain prior tests performed by Suburban
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8087 - 2005-03-31

State v. Walter Lee Thomas
to the balancing test enunciated in State v. Dyess, 124 Wis.2d 525, 370 N.W.2d 222 (1985). According to Dyess: [T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11162 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eric Jason Smiley
has met the first four prongs of the test set forth in Carnemolla. He has presented evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6802 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
exchange occurred: [State]: In regard to the field sobriety tests, was [Krueger] willing to submit to them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68848 - 2011-08-01

[PDF] State v. Foist Johnson
) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in allowing the individual jurors to test the trigger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11313 - 2017-09-19

State v. Demitrius Goodlow
for this claim: (1) counsel’s failure to obtain discovery regarding fingerprint testing or adequately cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14910 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and therefore would not take the blood test. Deputy Coulthard also testified that he did not recall Whitwell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82884 - 2012-05-23

[PDF] Suburban Laboratories of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
No. 94-2390 -2- ordering the resampling of certain prior tests performed by Suburban
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8087 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
forensic testing. We resolve these issues against Gutierrez- Mendoza. Accordingly, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201054 - 2017-11-07

State v. Foist Johnson
) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in allowing the individual jurors to test the trigger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11313 - 2005-03-31