Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17081 - 17090 of 30107 for de.
Search results 17081 - 17090 of 30107 for de.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims. “On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the DOC acted within its jurisdiction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004235 - 2025-09-05
claims. “On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the DOC acted within its jurisdiction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004235 - 2025-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
, 278 N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114081 - 2014-06-09
, 278 N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114081 - 2014-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 393, 617 N.W.2d 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36010 - 2009-05-11
de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d 393, 617 N.W.2d 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36010 - 2009-05-11
CA Blank Order
presents a question of law for our de novo review. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶14, 343 Wis. 2d 43, 817
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141073 - 2015-04-28
presents a question of law for our de novo review. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶14, 343 Wis. 2d 43, 817
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141073 - 2015-04-28
[PDF]
WI 91
review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33407 - 2014-09-15
review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33407 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in that respect. In terms of [past] pain and suffering, $10,000 is de minimis. But it is the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107420 - 2017-09-21
in that respect. In terms of [past] pain and suffering, $10,000 is de minimis. But it is the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107420 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 7, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
to prejudice are determinations we review de novo. See id. I. Trial counsel’s alleged failure to investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57399 - 2010-12-06
to prejudice are determinations we review de novo. See id. I. Trial counsel’s alleged failure to investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57399 - 2010-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-in-chief argues for a wholesale de novo standard of review, given their arguments it appears a more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685413 - 2023-08-02
-in-chief argues for a wholesale de novo standard of review, given their arguments it appears a more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685413 - 2023-08-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the agreement. Cahoon appeals. ¶6 Our review is de novo, both with regard to summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110997 - 2017-09-21
of the agreement. Cahoon appeals. ¶6 Our review is de novo, both with regard to summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21