Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17501 - 17510 of 30115 for de.

CA Blank Order
presents a question of law for our de novo review. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶14, 343 Wis. 2d 43, 817
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141073 - 2015-04-28

Bruce A. Doane v. Helenville Mutual Insurance Company
lawsuit is a question of statutory interpretation, which we will review de novo. Kosky v. International
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12487 - 2005-03-31

State v. William R. Scott
constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3407 - 2005-03-31

State v. Leonard Avery
that we review de novo. Id. In addition, we must view the evidence in a light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9779 - 2014-09-08

Larry C. Olson v. Charles H. Thompson
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 442, 468 N.W.2d at 23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11517 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jameel A. Ali
-assistance-of-counsel claims is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Toliver, 187 Wis.2d 346
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9095 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
included offense instruction should be submitted to a jury is a question of law which we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10023 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
included offense instruction should be submitted to a jury is a question of law which we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10024 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
hearing is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Tucker, 2012 WI App 67, ¶6, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=809656 - 2024-06-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for the interpretation of those documents governing the Associations, our review is de novo. See Solowicz v. Forward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113795 - 2017-09-21