Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2131 - 2140 of 20855 for word.
Search results 2131 - 2140 of 20855 for word.
[PDF]
State v. Clarence E. Hill
on that crime. In other words, Hill wanted to give the jury a chance to either convict him of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8344 - 2017-09-19
on that crime. In other words, Hill wanted to give the jury a chance to either convict him of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8344 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert Plevin v. Department of Transportation
. ADMIN. CODE § TRANS 100.09 are illustrative and not exhaustive. He provides an analysis of the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5959 - 2017-09-19
. ADMIN. CODE § TRANS 100.09 are illustrative and not exhaustive. He provides an analysis of the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5959 - 2017-09-19
Northwest Properties v. Outagamie County
. Statutes should be construed so that no word or clause will be rendered surplusage. State v. Martin, 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13397 - 2005-03-31
. Statutes should be construed so that no word or clause will be rendered surplusage. State v. Martin, 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13397 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher James
.” The term “consent” is defined by the statute as, inter alia, “words or overt actions ... indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8869 - 2017-09-19
.” The term “consent” is defined by the statute as, inter alia, “words or overt actions ... indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8869 - 2017-09-19
State v. Stephen E. Lee
court is not required to use “magic words” in effectuating its adjudication. See State v. Echols, 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14485 - 2005-03-31
court is not required to use “magic words” in effectuating its adjudication. See State v. Echols, 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14485 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald Savinski
) the use of the word “has” in both the present and past tense in the same sentence confused the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12522 - 2005-03-31
) the use of the word “has” in both the present and past tense in the same sentence confused the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12522 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tracy and Damian Osterhues v. Board of Adjustment for Washburn County
Wis. 2d 356, 360, 369 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1985). The use of the word “appeals” is generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6774 - 2017-09-20
Wis. 2d 356, 360, 369 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1985). The use of the word “appeals” is generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6774 - 2017-09-20
2009 WI APP 40
with this decision.” This argument ignores the words “consistent with this decision.” The ALJ’s decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35480 - 2009-03-24
with this decision.” This argument ignores the words “consistent with this decision.” The ALJ’s decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35480 - 2009-03-24
[PDF]
the legislature’s intent is expressed in the words it used.” Mayo v. Boyd, 2014 WI App 37, ¶8, 353 Wis. 2d 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259014 - 2020-04-30
the legislature’s intent is expressed in the words it used.” Mayo v. Boyd, 2014 WI App 37, ¶8, 353 Wis. 2d 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259014 - 2020-04-30
[PDF]
Ronald Berry v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. The department received word that the federal funding and authorizations for sixty-one employees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12014 - 2017-09-21
. The department received word that the federal funding and authorizations for sixty-one employees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12014 - 2017-09-21