Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2131 - 2140 of 20941 for word.
Search results 2131 - 2140 of 20941 for word.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2004 WI 58, ¶45, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110. Words are to be given their common and ordinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168418 - 2017-09-21
, 2004 WI 58, ¶45, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110. Words are to be given their common and ordinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168418 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald Savinski
of the word “has” in both the present and past tense in the same sentence confused the jury, and (2) it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11524 - 2017-09-19
of the word “has” in both the present and past tense in the same sentence confused the jury, and (2) it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11524 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
construe statutes by discerning the plain meaning of the words of the statute to discover the legislature’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
construe statutes by discerning the plain meaning of the words of the statute to discover the legislature’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Kazim Investment, Inc.
in Family Savings). While solid in isolation, these words dissolve in this case for two reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6160 - 2005-03-31
in Family Savings). While solid in isolation, these words dissolve in this case for two reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6160 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen E. Lee
court is not required to use “magic words” in effectuating its adjudication. See State v. Echols, 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14485 - 2005-03-31
court is not required to use “magic words” in effectuating its adjudication. See State v. Echols, 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald Berry v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. The department received word that the federal funding and authorizations for sixty-one employees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12014 - 2017-09-21
. The department received word that the federal funding and authorizations for sixty-one employees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12014 - 2017-09-21
Tracy and Damian Osterhues v. Board of Adjustment for Washburn County
of the word “appeals” is generally not considered to entitle an appellant to a trial de novo. Kuehnel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6774 - 2005-03-31
of the word “appeals” is generally not considered to entitle an appellant to a trial de novo. Kuehnel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6774 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 40
with this decision.” This argument ignores the words “consistent with this decision.” The ALJ’s decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35480 - 2009-03-24
with this decision.” This argument ignores the words “consistent with this decision.” The ALJ’s decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35480 - 2009-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
doubt.” Id., ¶39. In other words, the test here is “whether a circuit court, acting reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76273 - 2014-09-15
doubt.” Id., ¶39. In other words, the test here is “whether a circuit court, acting reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76273 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpreted the video as showing that Torres and L.J. “had words in front of the officer station prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261598 - 2020-05-21
interpreted the video as showing that Torres and L.J. “had words in front of the officer station prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261598 - 2020-05-21