Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22051 - 22060 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22051 - 22060 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184689 - 2017-09-21
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184689 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which we also review de novo. Tesker, 208 Wis. 2d at 605. Ordinance No. 785
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161306 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we also review de novo. Tesker, 208 Wis. 2d at 605. Ordinance No. 785
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161306 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 15
Whether a discovery violation has occurred poses a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158288 - 2017-09-21
Whether a discovery violation has occurred poses a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Troy B. Baker
of the trial court’s authority under that statute. These are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16341 - 2017-09-21
of the trial court’s authority under that statute. These are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16341 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Free’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct because the instances were “of such de minimus effect so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67962 - 2011-07-19
Free’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct because the instances were “of such de minimus effect so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67962 - 2011-07-19
[PDF]
WI 17
to determine if they are clearly erroneous, and we must review de novo its conclusions of law regarding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961978 - 2025-05-27
to determine if they are clearly erroneous, and we must review de novo its conclusions of law regarding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961978 - 2025-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. See State v. Badker, 2001 WI App 27, ¶8, 240 Wis. 2d 460, 623 N.W.2d 142. ¶27 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94010 - 2013-03-12
reviews de novo. See State v. Badker, 2001 WI App 27, ¶8, 240 Wis. 2d 460, 623 N.W.2d 142. ¶27 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94010 - 2013-03-12
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ralph A. Kalal
Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19954 - 2005-10-13
Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19954 - 2005-10-13
Wisconsin Gas Company v. Beth Bauer
). ¶14 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3598 - 2005-03-31
). ¶14 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3598 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standards. Id., ¶25. ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134506 - 2015-02-04
omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standards. Id., ¶25. ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134506 - 2015-02-04