Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22051 - 22060 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22051 - 22060 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. No. 2021AP564 7 ¶16 O’Haire raises two arguments on appeal. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449319 - 2021-11-04
de novo. Id. No. 2021AP564 7 ¶16 O’Haire raises two arguments on appeal. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449319 - 2021-11-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
release program frustrates the purpose of the sentences imposed. 4 ¶19 Regardless, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100035 - 2017-09-21
release program frustrates the purpose of the sentences imposed. 4 ¶19 Regardless, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100035 - 2017-09-21
State v. Troy B. Baker
of the trial court’s authority under that statute. These are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16341 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court’s authority under that statute. These are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16341 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. C&S Management, Inc.
these constitutional challenges de novo. Village of Oregon v. Waldofsky, 177 Wis.2d 412, 417, 501 N.W.2d 912, 913
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8332 - 2017-09-19
these constitutional challenges de novo. Village of Oregon v. Waldofsky, 177 Wis.2d 412, 417, 501 N.W.2d 912, 913
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8332 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. This presents a legal question which we review de novo. See State v. Anderson, 2002 WI 7, ¶12, 249 Wis. 2d 586
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49293 - 2010-04-26
. This presents a legal question which we review de novo. See State v. Anderson, 2002 WI 7, ¶12, 249 Wis. 2d 586
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49293 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will uphold the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611642 - 2023-01-18
will uphold the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611642 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177499 - 2017-09-21
to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177499 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing is a question of law we review de novo.” Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶21. ¶12 Under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190531 - 2017-09-21
hearing is a question of law we review de novo.” Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶21. ¶12 Under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190531 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether the parent was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107968 - 2014-02-12
performance was deficient and whether the parent was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107968 - 2014-02-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36413 - 2014-09-15
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36413 - 2014-09-15