Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22051 - 22060 of 29827 for des.

[PDF] Charles Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.
, 162 Wis. 2d 797, 802, 471 N.W.2d 7 (1991). We apply a de novo standard when reviewing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17364 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, whether the facts entitle the defendant to withdraw his plea is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96281 - 2013-05-01

Elaine Teichmiller v. Rogers Memorial Hospital Incorporated
a grant of summary judgment raises an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13889 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State of Wisconsin Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Bell
of statutes and their application to the facts— which we decide de novo. State v. Schoepp, 204 Wis.2d 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11601 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 568, ¶26. We determine de novo whether the defendant has demonstrated deficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98794 - 2013-10-15

Harvest Savings Bank v. ROI Investments
the surplus is a question of law that we review de novo. See First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. Rosen, 143 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10652 - 2012-09-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
challenges the conclusions the circuit court drew from those factual findings. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243907 - 2019-07-18

Brenda Murphy v. Bruce C. Nordhagen
6, 1993. We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13673 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
”). This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 2009 WI 57, ¶22, 318 Wis. 2d 21, 767 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109596 - 2014-03-26

COURT OF APPEALS
to a fair trial and raises a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶14 We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81333 - 2012-04-17