Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25011 - 25020 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 25011 - 25020 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Dariell D. Cross
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14404 - 2005-03-31
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14404 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133449 - 2015-01-26
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133449 - 2015-01-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
errors in the no-merit report. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251489 - 2019-12-17
errors in the no-merit report. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251489 - 2019-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655893 - 2023-05-17
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655893 - 2023-05-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
89, ¶¶40-41, 328 Wis. 2d 1, 786 N.W.2d 124. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98882 - 2014-09-15
89, ¶¶40-41, 328 Wis. 2d 1, 786 N.W.2d 124. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98882 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion, based on the limited record that was available to the court at the time of sentencing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113770 - 2014-06-04
discretion, based on the limited record that was available to the court at the time of sentencing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113770 - 2014-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
complaint against her former employer. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062702 - 2026-01-15
complaint against her former employer. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062702 - 2026-01-15
CA Blank Order
issues. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92923 - 2013-02-18
issues. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92923 - 2013-02-18
State v. Phillip E. Bacon
hearing on the record. Bacon has established neither deficient performance nor prejudice to the defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10011 - 2005-03-31
hearing on the record. Bacon has established neither deficient performance nor prejudice to the defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10011 - 2005-03-31
State v. Walter J. Griffin
The record supports the trial court’s finding of no breach in this case. The prosecutor unequivocally stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22
The record supports the trial court’s finding of no breach in this case. The prosecutor unequivocally stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22