Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25031 - 25040 of 29985 for de.
Search results 25031 - 25040 of 29985 for de.
State v. Erik Gracia
and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law we review de novo. Id. at 236-37. Counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4710 - 2005-03-31
and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law we review de novo. Id. at 236-37. Counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4710 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 2, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
for the pertinent time period. Discussion ¶3 We review summary judgment de novo, construing the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138946 - 2015-04-01
for the pertinent time period. Discussion ¶3 We review summary judgment de novo, construing the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138946 - 2015-04-01
Sylvia A. Shovers v. Gary D. Shovers
a summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24778 - 2006-06-27
a summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24778 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
WI App 5
court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204933 - 2018-08-23
court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204933 - 2018-08-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355 Wis. 2d 617, 850 N.W.2d 42. ¶40 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165172 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355 Wis. 2d 617, 850 N.W.2d 42. ¶40 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165172 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Sharp, 180 Wis. 2d 640, 650, 511 N.W.2d 316 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73607 - 2011-11-09
of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Sharp, 180 Wis. 2d 640, 650, 511 N.W.2d 316 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73607 - 2011-11-09
Kim J. Barksdale v. Jon Litscher
and applied the doctrine of claim preclusion are questions of law that we review de novo. See Truttschel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6326 - 2005-03-31
and applied the doctrine of claim preclusion are questions of law that we review de novo. See Truttschel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6326 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher Anson
review of a constitutional fact on the grounds of established historical fact, however, is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6537 - 2005-03-31
review of a constitutional fact on the grounds of established historical fact, however, is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6537 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.08 (2007-08).[3] An appellate court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, and applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45529 - 2010-01-11
. § 802.08 (2007-08).[3] An appellate court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, and applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45529 - 2010-01-11
Frontsheet
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30519 - 2007-10-03
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30519 - 2007-10-03