Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25481 - 25490 of 69007 for had.

COURT OF APPEALS
had not at the time of the October 23, 2013 hearing on the motion, evidently due to the 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136022 - 2015-03-03

COURT OF APPEALS
informed the parties that just before lunch, he had asked his clerk “to go to the jury and ask the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34159 - 2008-09-29

[PDF] Lori Trost v. Keith D. Trost
. Under that agreement, Lori had primary physical placement of the couple’s daughter Alice. Keith had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15502 - 2017-09-21

State v. Victor Villalobos
of blood. It was determined that Roseann was dead at the scene and an autopsy revealed that she had died
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7985 - 2005-03-31

WI App 137 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP64-CR Complete Title ...
at the Winnebago County Jail to pick up his daughter, who had been arrested for OWI. Jail regulations mandate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89308 - 2012-12-18

CA Blank Order
the termination ground of continuing CHIPs, the County needed to show, as to each child: (1) that the child had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108747 - 2014-03-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). At sentencing, the prosecutor noted that the circuit court had to address a “relatively narrow” issue under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657529 - 2023-05-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Although there had been snow fall, the road is “one of the more well- maintained roads by the city plow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149931 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Daniel E. Creviston
, testified that he received a dispatch at 2:40 a.m. indicating that a man had been seen leaving his car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15533 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Town of Beloit v. Thomas Goodwin
, contending that Goodwin was not entitled to a “new” trial because he had not had a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15555 - 2017-09-21