Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 91511 for 1.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 91511 for 1.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Dane County: NICHOLAS J. McNAMARA, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FITZPATRICK, J. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208750 - 2018-02-22
of the circuit court for Dane County: NICHOLAS J. McNAMARA, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FITZPATRICK, J. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208750 - 2018-02-22
[PDF]
Ernest J. Koger v. Town of Seymour
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Ernest Koger appeals an order lifting a stay of the raze order issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4092 - 2017-09-20
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Ernest Koger appeals an order lifting a stay of the raze order issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4092 - 2017-09-20
2006 WI APP 260
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 DYKMAN, J. Angela S., as guardian of her husband’s estate, appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26674 - 2006-12-19
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 DYKMAN, J. Angela S., as guardian of her husband’s estate, appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26674 - 2006-12-19
[PDF]
WI APP 260
, JJ. ¶1 DYKMAN, J. Angela S., as guardian of her husband’s estate, appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26674 - 2014-09-15
, JJ. ¶1 DYKMAN, J. Angela S., as guardian of her husband’s estate, appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26674 - 2014-09-15
State v. Matthew C. Janssen
of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 JON P. WILCOX, J. On June 14, 1777, the Continental Congress
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17253 - 2005-03-31
of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 JON P. WILCOX, J. On June 14, 1777, the Continental Congress
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17253 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 37
and voted to grant the petition. IT IS ORDERED that: SECTION 1. 48.29 (1) of the statutes is amended
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360509 - 2021-04-23
and voted to grant the petition. IT IS ORDERED that: SECTION 1. 48.29 (1) of the statutes is amended
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360509 - 2021-04-23
[PDF]
WI 37
and voted to grant the petition. IT IS ORDERED that: SECTION 1. 48.29 (1) of the statutes is amended
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360509 - 2021-04-23
and voted to grant the petition. IT IS ORDERED that: SECTION 1. 48.29 (1) of the statutes is amended
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360509 - 2021-04-23
Frontsheet
. Affirmed. ¶1 PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J. We review a decision of the court of appeals[1] affirming
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35308 - 2009-01-22
. Affirmed. ¶1 PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J. We review a decision of the court of appeals[1] affirming
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35308 - 2009-01-22
Tatiahanah Marie Miller v. Mauston School District
with directions. Before Vergeront, Roggensack, Nichol,[1] JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12689 - 2005-03-31
with directions. Before Vergeront, Roggensack, Nichol,[1] JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12689 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Latosha Armstead
. Armstead claims that the trial court erred because: (1) the “reverse waiver” statutory scheme violates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13160 - 2017-09-21
. Armstead claims that the trial court erred because: (1) the “reverse waiver” statutory scheme violates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13160 - 2017-09-21