Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 20941 for word.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 20941 for word.
State v. Lindsey A.F.
reliance on the word “notice” as the “empowering” word of secs. 938.245(6) and 938.24(5) is simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3484 - 2005-03-31
reliance on the word “notice” as the “empowering” word of secs. 938.245(6) and 938.24(5) is simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3484 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and not ambiguous. Wisconsin Label Corp., 233 Wis. 2d 314, ¶31. When “injury” “is qualified by the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62145 - 2014-09-15
and not ambiguous. Wisconsin Label Corp., 233 Wis. 2d 314, ¶31. When “injury” “is qualified by the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62145 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 52
is given its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169664 - 2017-09-21
is given its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169664 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
interpretation of a statute by an agency is one that ‘directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17306 - 2005-03-31
interpretation of a statute by an agency is one that ‘directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17306 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 252
, 295 Wis. 2d 801, 722 N.W.2d 136, none of the statements were “testimonial” as that word of art is used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30375 - 2007-12-18
, 295 Wis. 2d 801, 722 N.W.2d 136, none of the statements were “testimonial” as that word of art is used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30375 - 2007-12-18
[PDF]
Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins
conclusion that because nothing in the wording of the contract expressly required HABCO to purchase more
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7687 - 2017-09-19
conclusion that because nothing in the wording of the contract expressly required HABCO to purchase more
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7687 - 2017-09-19
Agnes E. Maciolek v. City of Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System Annuity and Pension Board
]tatutes ... should be construed to give effect ‘to each and every word, clause and sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7505 - 2005-05-09
]tatutes ... should be construed to give effect ‘to each and every word, clause and sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7505 - 2005-05-09
2008 WI APP 95
, except that technical or specially defined words are given their technical or special definitions. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32574 - 2011-06-14
, except that technical or specially defined words are given their technical or special definitions. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32574 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
WI App 65
common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868937 - 2024-12-18
common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868937 - 2024-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the word “threat” include “an indication of impending No. 2019AP1709 11 danger or harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380742 - 2021-06-29
of the word “threat” include “an indication of impending No. 2019AP1709 11 danger or harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380742 - 2021-06-29