Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26351 - 26360 of 61903 for does.
Search results 26351 - 26360 of 61903 for does.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
acquittal—standing alone—does not warrant a new revocation hearing. The reason for this rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87531 - 2014-09-15
acquittal—standing alone—does not warrant a new revocation hearing. The reason for this rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87531 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
does not define “good cause,” it is appropriate to consider the reasons that permit relief from large
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197312 - 2017-10-04
does not define “good cause,” it is appropriate to consider the reasons that permit relief from large
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197312 - 2017-10-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
does not demonstrate ineffectiveness, and “[w]e will not assume ineffective assistance from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168125 - 2017-09-21
does not demonstrate ineffectiveness, and “[w]e will not assume ineffective assistance from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168125 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Meddaugh
). The language of the statute does not make a distinction between the drawing of blood and its subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3714 - 2017-09-19
). The language of the statute does not make a distinction between the drawing of blood and its subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3714 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
not shown prejudice. He does not allege what his lawyer would have learned had she interviewed Morales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31046 - 2007-12-03
not shown prejudice. He does not allege what his lawyer would have learned had she interviewed Morales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31046 - 2007-12-03
[PDF]
State v. John J. Watson
over the phone,” and concluded that the public-records exception “does not allow admission
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8931 - 2017-09-19
over the phone,” and concluded that the public-records exception “does not allow admission
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Matthew Tyler
Christensen’s observations the day following the incident included the word “on” rather than “off” does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13121 - 2017-09-21
Christensen’s observations the day following the incident included the word “on” rather than “off” does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13121 - 2017-09-21
Steve Uselmann v. Shawn Klinzing
of existing law.” The statute does not allow the trial court to conclude frivolousness or lack of it without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24798 - 2006-04-11
of existing law.” The statute does not allow the trial court to conclude frivolousness or lack of it without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24798 - 2006-04-11
Jessica Smith v. Nikolas H. Markos
asserts that he or she did not intend to injure or harm does not prevent a court from inferring intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13489 - 2005-03-31
asserts that he or she did not intend to injure or harm does not prevent a court from inferring intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13489 - 2005-03-31
Christine A. Trampf v. Prudential Property & CasualtyCompany
court's conclusions of law. Id. Prudential argues that its UM policy does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8569 - 2005-03-31
court's conclusions of law. Id. Prudential argues that its UM policy does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8569 - 2005-03-31