Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28541 - 28550 of 29810 for des.
Search results 28541 - 28550 of 29810 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Dennis J. Reitter
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Zielke, 137 Wis. 2d 39, 44-45, 403 N.W.2d 427 (1987); State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17383 - 2017-09-21
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Zielke, 137 Wis. 2d 39, 44-45, 403 N.W.2d 427 (1987); State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17383 - 2017-09-21
State v. William J. Church
double jeopardy is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13199 - 2005-03-31
double jeopardy is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13199 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347582 - 2021-03-16
entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347582 - 2021-03-16
Frontsheet
. This court reviews questions of law de novo. D.S.P. v. State, 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W.2d 234 (1992
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116771 - 2014-07-09
. This court reviews questions of law de novo. D.S.P. v. State, 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W.2d 234 (1992
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116771 - 2014-07-09
2007 WI APP 21
the interpretation of a statute, is generally a question of law, subject to de novo review. Brown v. Brown, 177 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27904 - 2007-02-27
the interpretation of a statute, is generally a question of law, subject to de novo review. Brown v. Brown, 177 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27904 - 2007-02-27
State v. Charles W. Mark
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶43 When construing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6732 - 2005-05-09
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶43 When construing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6732 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
Emil E. Jankee v. Clark County
. DISCUSSION We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9477 - 2017-09-19
. DISCUSSION We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9477 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is enforceable under this statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Waite v. Easton-White Creek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066781 - 2026-01-23
is enforceable under this statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Waite v. Easton-White Creek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066781 - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
State v. Earl L. Murdock
. The interpretation and application of statutes present questions of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15202 - 2017-09-21
. The interpretation and application of statutes present questions of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15202 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles W. Mark
. Whether the court’s construction is correct presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6732 - 2017-09-20
. Whether the court’s construction is correct presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6732 - 2017-09-20