Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28911 - 28920 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 28911 - 28920 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. James Nesbitt
in 1 Nesbitt’s criminal record was reported as follows: On 10-18-88: burglary under Case Number 88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13113 - 2017-09-21
in 1 Nesbitt’s criminal record was reported as follows: On 10-18-88: burglary under Case Number 88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13113 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a case consolidation document at that hearing, which set forth the same agreement.[2] The plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97931 - 2013-06-10
a case consolidation document at that hearing, which set forth the same agreement.[2] The plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97931 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
WI APP 180
2009 WI APP 180 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP460-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44050 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 180 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP460-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44050 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
court found that the Department had provided “services in terms of case management, review of conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55522 - 2010-10-13
court found that the Department had provided “services in terms of case management, review of conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55522 - 2010-10-13
N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
Case No.: 95-0755 Complete
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16995 - 2005-03-31
Case No.: 95-0755 Complete
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16995 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reject his arguments and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 This Waukesha county case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58813 - 2011-01-11
reject his arguments and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 This Waukesha county case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58813 - 2011-01-11
01-17 Creation of SCR Ch. 63 - Code of Ethics for Court Interpreters (Effective 07-01-02)
complaint, information, and preliminary hearing transcript in a criminal case; and the summons, complaint
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=960 - 2005-03-31
complaint, information, and preliminary hearing transcript in a criminal case; and the summons, complaint
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=960 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
01-17 Creation of SCR Ch. 63 - Code of Ethics for Court Interpreters (Effective 07-01-02)
, information, and preliminary hearing transcript in a criminal case; and the summons, complaint, and answer
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1133 - 2017-09-19
, information, and preliminary hearing transcript in a criminal case; and the summons, complaint, and answer
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1133 - 2017-09-19
State v. James Nesbitt
. Our review of the trial court’s use of the repeater penalty in this case requires the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13113 - 2005-03-31
. Our review of the trial court’s use of the repeater penalty in this case requires the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not given the opportunity to hear and examine evidence that bears on a significant issue in the case, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540916 - 2022-07-08
was not given the opportunity to hear and examine evidence that bears on a significant issue in the case, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540916 - 2022-07-08