Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29121 - 29130 of 30191 for de.
Search results 29121 - 29130 of 30191 for de.
Frontsheet
they are clearly erroneous. Id. Second, this court reviews de novo whether the facts meet the constitutional
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83581 - 2012-06-11
they are clearly erroneous. Id. Second, this court reviews de novo whether the facts meet the constitutional
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83581 - 2012-06-11
State v. Jeffrey Lorenzo Searcy
violates a defendant’s right to confrontation presents a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20717 - 2006-01-24
violates a defendant’s right to confrontation presents a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20717 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
WI App 1
this argument for two reasons. First, our review of a decision granting summary judgment is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204828 - 2018-02-12
this argument for two reasons. First, our review of a decision granting summary judgment is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204828 - 2018-02-12
Frontsheet
. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶25 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo but benefits from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117737 - 2014-07-21
. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶25 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo but benefits from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117737 - 2014-07-21
Orion Flight Services, Inc. v. Basler Flight Service
This case presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25227 - 2006-05-18
This case presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25227 - 2006-05-18
State v. Glenn F. Schwebke
of the statute. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we may decide de novo. Douglas D., 2001
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17580 - 2005-03-31
of the statute. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we may decide de novo. Douglas D., 2001
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17580 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
unless clearly erroneous, and "our application of constitutional principles to those facts is de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118829 - 2014-09-15
unless clearly erroneous, and "our application of constitutional principles to those facts is de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118829 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
)2.-5. The interpretation and application of § 51.35 present questions of law that we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99312 - 2017-09-21
)2.-5. The interpretation and application of § 51.35 present questions of law that we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99312 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Madison Metropolitan School District
consisting exclusively of such employees. We review de novo a circuit court's interpretation of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7739 - 2017-09-19
consisting exclusively of such employees. We review de novo a circuit court's interpretation of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7739 - 2017-09-19
2007 WI APP 22
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶31 We review a summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27629 - 2007-02-27
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶31 We review a summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27629 - 2007-02-27