Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30111 - 30120 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30111 - 30120 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
by flooding. Allen argues that the trial court erred in its ruling on motions in limine, that the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95729 - 2013-04-24
by flooding. Allen argues that the trial court erred in its ruling on motions in limine, that the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95729 - 2013-04-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court was “not convinced that this case is the appropriate vehicle [to resolve these problems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32933 - 2008-06-04
. The court was “not convinced that this case is the appropriate vehicle [to resolve these problems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32933 - 2008-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 15, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102984 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 15, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102984 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
with the case.” Williams’s lawyer told the trial court about this violation of the no-contact order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59509 - 2011-01-31
with the case.” Williams’s lawyer told the trial court about this violation of the no-contact order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59509 - 2011-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was “procedurally nearly identical” to Krist’s case, the circuit court determined that Krist’s § 32.20 action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118091 - 2014-07-28
was “procedurally nearly identical” to Krist’s case, the circuit court determined that Krist’s § 32.20 action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118091 - 2014-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the circuit court erred by vacating the original order for this case to be tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50469 - 2010-05-26
argues that the circuit court erred by vacating the original order for this case to be tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50469 - 2010-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from events that took place during the night
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104908 - 2013-11-26
of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from events that took place during the night
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104908 - 2013-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
. At the subsequent bench trial, the circuit court dismissed the matter at the close of Amir’s case, finding that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42255 - 2009-10-14
. At the subsequent bench trial, the circuit court dismissed the matter at the close of Amir’s case, finding that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42255 - 2009-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 5, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108494 - 2014-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 5, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108494 - 2014-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 8, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57400 - 2010-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 8, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57400 - 2010-12-07