Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31441 - 31450 of 63537 for records.
Search results 31441 - 31450 of 63537 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standards support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standards support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS
at sentencing ... unless the court finds substantial reason to do so and states the reason on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52903 - 2010-08-02
at sentencing ... unless the court finds substantial reason to do so and states the reason on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52903 - 2010-08-02
James C. Dillard, Sr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
Dillard next argues that the adjustment committee improperly relied on evidence outside the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4857 - 2005-03-31
Dillard next argues that the adjustment committee improperly relied on evidence outside the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4857 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Aring Equipment Company, Inc. v. All-Ways Snow & Ice Control Contractors, Inc.
for payments already made. We affirm the trial court's judgment. The record indicates that in June 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10675 - 2017-09-20
for payments already made. We affirm the trial court's judgment. The record indicates that in June 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10675 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
James Burkmaster v. Robert Wayne Heimerl
on facts of record and the correct legal standards, and reaches a reasonable result. Hartung v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12158 - 2017-09-21
on facts of record and the correct legal standards, and reaches a reasonable result. Hartung v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12158 - 2017-09-21
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Joshua J. Minich
of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. See Burkes v. Hales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21442 - 2006-02-15
of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. See Burkes v. Hales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21442 - 2006-02-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
not appear that Hodge made any effort to ask the court to place the instruction on the record. In any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51500 - 2014-09-15
not appear that Hodge made any effort to ask the court to place the instruction on the record. In any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51500 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dennis C. Gandy
that Gandy requested an additional test to follow the primary one. After examining the record, we hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16159 - 2005-03-31
that Gandy requested an additional test to follow the primary one. After examining the record, we hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16159 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does not support his position. Batson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33531 - 2008-07-29
that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does not support his position. Batson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33531 - 2008-07-29
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
not challenge this history. Instead, he appears to be arguing that he had no prior convictions on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02
not challenge this history. Instead, he appears to be arguing that he had no prior convictions on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02