Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32741 - 32750 of 97795 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32741 - 32750 of 97795 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the disorderly conduct charge and a burglary charge in an unrelated case. The court found Loos guilty. On March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96635 - 2013-05-13
to the disorderly conduct charge and a burglary charge in an unrelated case. The court found Loos guilty. On March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96635 - 2013-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91896 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91896 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 23, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47255 - 2010-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 23, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47255 - 2010-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of $37,650 from Schmitz. Schmitz contends that the circuit court improperly resolved the case by summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34412 - 2008-10-28
of $37,650 from Schmitz. Schmitz contends that the circuit court improperly resolved the case by summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34412 - 2008-10-28
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 7, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2014-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 7, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2014-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
appropriate in this case. As such, the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115235 - 2014-06-23
appropriate in this case. As such, the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115235 - 2014-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88545 - 2014-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88545 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2017AP1227 6 ΒΆ9 The trial court made a finding that L.J. was unfit in each of the three cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212017 - 2018-05-01
2017AP1227 6 ΒΆ9 The trial court made a finding that L.J. was unfit in each of the three cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212017 - 2018-05-01
[PDF]
State v. Eduardo Alicea
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 2, 2002 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4907 - 2017-09-19
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 2, 2002 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4907 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eduardo Alicea
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 2, 2002 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4907 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 2, 2002 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4907 - 2005-03-31