Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 29942 for des.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 29942 for des.
State v. Daniel Slaughter
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis.2d 190, 199, 407 N.W.2d 281, 286 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8516 - 2005-03-31
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis.2d 190, 199, 407 N.W.2d 281, 286 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8516 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey O. Bates
, voluntarily, and intelligently is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. State v. Bangert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4828 - 2005-03-31
, voluntarily, and intelligently is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. State v. Bangert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4828 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
probable cause to justify a criminal charge presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37713 - 2009-07-15
probable cause to justify a criminal charge presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37713 - 2009-07-15
Jane Roe v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
cause of action. DISCUSSION We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13407 - 2005-03-31
cause of action. DISCUSSION We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13407 - 2005-03-31
Real Estate Enterprises, LLC v. June J. Marth
of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11521 - 2005-03-31
of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11521 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Camille N. Skotnicki
de novo. See State v. Walters, 224 Wis. 2d 897, 901, 591 N.W.2d 874, 875-76 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15921 - 2017-09-21
de novo. See State v. Walters, 224 Wis. 2d 897, 901, 591 N.W.2d 874, 875-76 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15921 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90590 - 2014-09-15
” is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90590 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the PBT and granted Swan’s motion. ¶4 The matter was appealed to the circuit court, for a trial de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167017 - 2017-09-21
the PBT and granted Swan’s motion. ¶4 The matter was appealed to the circuit court, for a trial de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentenced on inaccurate information is reviewed de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶10 The State concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144252 - 2017-09-21
sentenced on inaccurate information is reviewed de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶10 The State concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144252 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
committed legal malpractice. We affirm. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶2 We review de novo a court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174192 - 2017-09-21
committed legal malpractice. We affirm. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶2 We review de novo a court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174192 - 2017-09-21