Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 29810 for des.
Search results 3311 - 3320 of 29810 for des.
Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System v. City of Milwaukee
court’s grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14067 - 2005-03-31
court’s grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14067 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI AP 121
at 533. Whether a defect is fundamental or technical is a question of law we review de novo. Mahoney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87626 - 2014-09-15
at 533. Whether a defect is fundamental or technical is a question of law we review de novo. Mahoney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87626 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Palisades
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97758 - 2013-06-03
a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Palisades
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97758 - 2013-06-03
Town of Cable Sanitary District No. 1 v. Telemark Interval Owners Association, Inc.
review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. See M&I First Nat'l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6567 - 2005-03-31
review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. See M&I First Nat'l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6567 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ernest J. P., Jr.
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21324 - 2006-02-07
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21324 - 2006-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
of three levels of deference to an agency’s legal conclusions: great weight, due weight, or de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30503 - 2007-10-03
of three levels of deference to an agency’s legal conclusions: great weight, due weight, or de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30503 - 2007-10-03
Robert Bingen v. Lisa Bzdusek
). When reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4578 - 2005-03-31
). When reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4578 - 2005-03-31
State v. Troy Barner
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9104 - 2005-03-31
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9104 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven Staudt v. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11986 - 2017-09-21
court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11986 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard Seider v. Connie O'Connell
of an agency presents a question of statutory construction, which we review de novo. DeBeck v. DNR, 172 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13953 - 2014-09-15
of an agency presents a question of statutory construction, which we review de novo. DeBeck v. DNR, 172 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13953 - 2014-09-15