Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37941 - 37950 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37941 - 37950 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Irene Stussy v. North Crawford School District
in the jury instructions and in denying a motion to change a verdict answer on negligence. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15084 - 2005-03-31
in the jury instructions and in denying a motion to change a verdict answer on negligence. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15084 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
convicting him of stalking and felony bail jumping. He also appeals an order denying his motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101589 - 2013-09-03
convicting him of stalking and felony bail jumping. He also appeals an order denying his motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101589 - 2013-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se motion asking the circuit court to stay his sentences pending appeal. The court declined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054187 - 2025-12-23
se motion asking the circuit court to stay his sentences pending appeal. The court declined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054187 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are to the 2009-10 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2012AP728-CR 2 motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88774 - 2014-09-15
are to the 2009-10 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2012AP728-CR 2 motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88774 - 2014-09-15
State v. Rose Marie Hartfield
a postconviction motion in which she argued that the circuit court at sentencing had provided primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25063 - 2006-05-08
a postconviction motion in which she argued that the circuit court at sentencing had provided primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25063 - 2006-05-08
State v. Benjay E. Kohanski
and the subsequent denial of his postconviction motions. Kohanski argues that he did not admit, and that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10373 - 2005-03-31
and the subsequent denial of his postconviction motions. Kohanski argues that he did not admit, and that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10373 - 2005-03-31
Griffin & Brand of McAllen, Inc. v. Richard H. Gumz
for taxes on the property. On April 17, 1995, on GB’s motion, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10710 - 2005-03-31
for taxes on the property. On April 17, 1995, on GB’s motion, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10710 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, as well as the order denying Roach’s postconviction motion. He contends the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82636 - 2012-05-16
, as well as the order denying Roach’s postconviction motion. He contends the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82636 - 2012-05-16
[PDF]
State v. Steven Schelk
erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence because the officers did Nos. 98-0021-CR 98-0022-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13486 - 2017-09-21
erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence because the officers did Nos. 98-0021-CR 98-0022-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13486 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the motion, the circuit court further explained its 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213877 - 2018-06-06
on the motion, the circuit court further explained its 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213877 - 2018-06-06