Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38441 - 38450 of 45854 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 38441 - 38450 of 45854 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS
test. ¶11 Here, prejudice does not lie because the sentencing court relied on accurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36979 - 2009-06-30
test. ¶11 Here, prejudice does not lie because the sentencing court relied on accurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36979 - 2009-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32802 - 2008-05-27
is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32802 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
Jay R. Lellman v. Annette Mott
. Nos. 96-0618-FT, 96-1689-FT -5- The test to be applied by the appellate court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10464 - 2017-09-20
. Nos. 96-0618-FT, 96-1689-FT -5- The test to be applied by the appellate court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10464 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness is a common sense test. The crucial question is whether the facts of the case would warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109118 - 2014-03-17
of reasonableness is a common sense test. The crucial question is whether the facts of the case would warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109118 - 2014-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
the wrong test for prejudice. The trial court evaluated prejudice in the context of a different result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43576 - 2009-11-16
the wrong test for prejudice. The trial court evaluated prejudice in the context of a different result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43576 - 2009-11-16
Robert E. Willow v. City of Menomonie
purpose can be conceived which might rationally justify the expenditure, the constitutional test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5852 - 2005-03-31
purpose can be conceived which might rationally justify the expenditure, the constitutional test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5852 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was benign, Jeckell underwent several more tests which revealed that the malignant No. 2009AP1097
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48500 - 2014-09-15
was benign, Jeckell underwent several more tests which revealed that the malignant No. 2009AP1097
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48500 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jerry Saenz v. John Husz
. App. 1988). The test is whether reasonable minds could arrive at the same conclusion reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8599 - 2017-09-19
. App. 1988). The test is whether reasonable minds could arrive at the same conclusion reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8599 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., 232 Wis. 2d 138, ¶46. ¶12 The test for harmless error is whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194215 - 2017-09-21
., 232 Wis. 2d 138, ¶46. ¶12 The test for harmless error is whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194215 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Emmanuel O. Okoronta
the prejudice component of the Strickland test, a defendant generally must show that “there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3101 - 2017-09-20
the prejudice component of the Strickland test, a defendant generally must show that “there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3101 - 2017-09-20