Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4051 - 4060 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 4051 - 4060 of 58285 for speedy trial.
State v. James L. Gilmore
for masked armed robbery and masked armed burglary, after a trial by jury. The trial court issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12538 - 2005-03-31
for masked armed robbery and masked armed burglary, after a trial by jury. The trial court issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12538 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas E. Smith
an officer, see Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1), as an habitual criminal, see Wis. Stat. § 939.62, and from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4933 - 2005-03-31
an officer, see Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1), as an habitual criminal, see Wis. Stat. § 939.62, and from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4933 - 2005-03-31
William T. Painter v. Ralph L. Zaun
a jury verdict and ordering a new trial.[1] Ralph L. Zaun cross-appeals challenging the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10322 - 2005-03-31
a jury verdict and ordering a new trial.[1] Ralph L. Zaun cross-appeals challenging the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10322 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Heinrich
a new trial to Kenneth Heinrich. The trial court granted Heinrich a new trial as a result of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12655 - 2017-09-21
a new trial to Kenneth Heinrich. The trial court granted Heinrich a new trial as a result of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12655 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James L. Gilmore
, after a trial by jury. The trial court issued consecutive fifteen- and five-year prison sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12538 - 2017-09-21
, after a trial by jury. The trial court issued consecutive fifteen- and five-year prison sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12538 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea.[1] He claims his trial counsel gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114894 - 2014-06-23
order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea.[1] He claims his trial counsel gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114894 - 2014-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
to challenge trial counsel’s effectiveness at sentencing constitutes a sufficient reason to overcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32547 - 2008-04-28
to challenge trial counsel’s effectiveness at sentencing constitutes a sufficient reason to overcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32547 - 2008-04-28
Foremost Industrial Exchange v. Scott Applin
unsuccessfully to get discovery responses from the defendants in that action, the trial court entered a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17972 - 2005-05-02
unsuccessfully to get discovery responses from the defendants in that action, the trial court entered a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17972 - 2005-05-02
Bethann Burazin Zaffiro v. Richard Lawrence Zaffiro
degree. The trial court found that Richard had income of $80,200 per year from his employment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6990 - 2005-03-31
degree. The trial court found that Richard had income of $80,200 per year from his employment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6990 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of conviction entered against him. He argues that the trial court committed No. 2007AP1741-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34159 - 2014-09-15
of conviction entered against him. He argues that the trial court committed No. 2007AP1741-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34159 - 2014-09-15