Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42021 - 42030 of 83992 for case number.
Search results 42021 - 42030 of 83992 for case number.
State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
. In these consolidated cases, Frankie Wardell Simmons, pro se, appeals from the circuit court order denying his petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4039 - 2005-03-31
. In these consolidated cases, Frankie Wardell Simmons, pro se, appeals from the circuit court order denying his petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4039 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Mequon v. Michael Sterr
days .... The issue in this case is whether the requirements of this paragraph are a prerequisite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9509 - 2017-09-19
days .... The issue in this case is whether the requirements of this paragraph are a prerequisite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9509 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Northpointe ApartmentsLimited Partnership v. Board of Review of theVillage of Brown Deer
) was not properly determined in the first instance. Because of our disposition of this case, it is not necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8586 - 2017-09-19
) was not properly determined in the first instance. Because of our disposition of this case, it is not necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8586 - 2017-09-19
City of Milwaukee v. Daniel E. Holman
appeared at a scheduling conference before the Honorable Jean DiMotto. The case was then scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14520 - 2005-03-31
appeared at a scheduling conference before the Honorable Jean DiMotto. The case was then scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14520 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Rick Pease, Jr.
concluded, “For reasons not related to the merits, this case is dismissed,” rather than repeating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18320 - 2017-09-21
concluded, “For reasons not related to the merits, this case is dismissed,” rather than repeating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18320 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32694 - 2008-05-13
disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32694 - 2008-05-13
State v. Rick Pease, Jr.
not related to the merits, this case is dismissed,” rather than repeating the court’s oral pronouncement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18320 - 2005-05-24
not related to the merits, this case is dismissed,” rather than repeating the court’s oral pronouncement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18320 - 2005-05-24
Margaret Hovey v. Allstate Insurance Company
, Hovey’s attorney did not arrive in the courtroom until after the case had been called and dismissed. Her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15197 - 2005-03-31
, Hovey’s attorney did not arrive in the courtroom until after the case had been called and dismissed. Her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15197 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel D. Brown
in the case, and under § 757.19(2)(g), because it prevented her from acting impartially in the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25550 - 2006-06-14
in the case, and under § 757.19(2)(g), because it prevented her from acting impartially in the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25550 - 2006-06-14