Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42061 - 42070 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 42061 - 42070 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
07AP1521 State v. Tyler J.K.
trial should not be weighed against him. Finally, Tyler also claims that the delay was prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31564 - 2008-01-22
trial should not be weighed against him. Finally, Tyler also claims that the delay was prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31564 - 2008-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
To establish a claim of ineffective assistance of defense counsel, the defendant must prove both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120946 - 2014-09-15
To establish a claim of ineffective assistance of defense counsel, the defendant must prove both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120946 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steve B. Tracy
, he claimed he did so only to chase and attack Gundy. 1. Telephone Testimony Tracy argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14033 - 2014-09-15
, he claimed he did so only to chase and attack Gundy. 1. Telephone Testimony Tracy argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14033 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the unanimity requirement to him in at least one of his prior cases. Moore further claims that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476526 - 2022-01-25
the unanimity requirement to him in at least one of his prior cases. Moore further claims that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476526 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the pilot flame. These allegations form the factual basis for both of the complaint’s claims: negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122956 - 2014-10-02
by the pilot flame. These allegations form the factual basis for both of the complaint’s claims: negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122956 - 2014-10-02
COURT OF APPEALS
four counts in the first trial and eight of the twelve counts in the second trial.[1] Welch claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33051 - 2008-06-16
four counts in the first trial and eight of the twelve counts in the second trial.[1] Welch claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33051 - 2008-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of the children to terminate parental rights.[3] Robert claims that termination based on § 48.415(7), as applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36247 - 2009-04-20
of the children to terminate parental rights.[3] Robert claims that termination based on § 48.415(7), as applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36247 - 2009-04-20
[PDF]
State v. Andrew B. Lamont
would testify or whether he would claim Fifth Amendment protections. Lamont was subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12769 - 2017-09-21
would testify or whether he would claim Fifth Amendment protections. Lamont was subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12769 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Counsel noted that the presentence investigation report (PSI) said that White claimed to no longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46365 - 2014-09-15
. Counsel noted that the presentence investigation report (PSI) said that White claimed to no longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46365 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jerry J. Wintlend
, in fact, addressed the issue but claimed that the court missed it. Wintlend wrote, in pertinent part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5140 - 2017-09-19
, in fact, addressed the issue but claimed that the court missed it. Wintlend wrote, in pertinent part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5140 - 2017-09-19