Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42271 - 42280 of 68288 for law.
Search results 42271 - 42280 of 68288 for law.
State v. Jose R.
or older who has violated any state or federal criminal law.”). He contends that his confession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
or older who has violated any state or federal criminal law.”). He contends that his confession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
Town of Harmony v. Donald T. Donahue and Stephen R. Donahue
nonconforming use defense. In effect, the trial court found as a matter of law that no reasonable jury could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2401 - 2005-03-31
nonconforming use defense. In effect, the trial court found as a matter of law that no reasonable jury could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2401 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for good cause shown,” applies here. While unsuitability ultimately is a question of law that we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189106 - 2017-09-21
for good cause shown,” applies here. While unsuitability ultimately is a question of law that we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189106 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy L.R.
as a matter of law. We agree that the original petition was inadequate, but nonetheless hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10441 - 2005-03-31
as a matter of law. We agree that the original petition was inadequate, but nonetheless hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10441 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
according to law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96851 - 2014-09-15
according to law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96851 - 2014-09-15
State v. Miguel A. Segarra
, the application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law we decide without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6828 - 2005-03-31
, the application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law we decide without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6828 - 2005-03-31
State v. J.B. Franklin, Jr.
a motion alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10145 - 2005-03-31
a motion alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10145 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
are voluntary. ¶7 We conclude that, as a matter of law, Eric was acting as a police agent during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61888 - 2013-12-23
are voluntary. ¶7 We conclude that, as a matter of law, Eric was acting as a police agent during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61888 - 2013-12-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
forth by the defendant constitutes a ‘new factor’ is a question of law.” Id. Second, “if a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80278 - 2014-09-15
forth by the defendant constitutes a ‘new factor’ is a question of law.” Id. Second, “if a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80278 - 2014-09-15
Steven D. Pederson v. Town Board of the Town of Windsor
, unreasonable, discriminatory or contrary to law. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8378 - 2005-05-16
, unreasonable, discriminatory or contrary to law. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8378 - 2005-05-16