Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4531 - 4540 of 29916 for des.
Search results 4531 - 4540 of 29916 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
On appeal, we review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141776 - 2015-05-18
On appeal, we review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141776 - 2015-05-18
State v. Kevin G. Vinje
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9127 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9127 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the clearly erroneous standard, but we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97503 - 2013-05-29
the clearly erroneous standard, but we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97503 - 2013-05-29
State v. Ralph F. Beilke
Beilke’s motion, concluding that the error was de minimis and that Beilke had admitted the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12155 - 2005-03-31
Beilke’s motion, concluding that the error was de minimis and that Beilke had admitted the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12155 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and convincing evidence that a new factor exists. See id. This presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380863 - 2021-06-29
and convincing evidence that a new factor exists. See id. This presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380863 - 2021-06-29
State v. Melvin C. Welch
that the letter arrived. ¶9 We determine the sufficiency of a criminal complaint de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4866 - 2005-03-31
that the letter arrived. ¶9 We determine the sufficiency of a criminal complaint de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4866 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
proceedings. ¶11 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59080 - 2014-09-15
proceedings. ¶11 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59080 - 2014-09-15
George Parker v. Arthur Jones
here. Although assisted by the circuit court’s decision, our review of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14765 - 2005-03-31
here. Although assisted by the circuit court’s decision, our review of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14765 - 2005-03-31
Carl H. Creedy v. Axley Brynelson
the same methodology as the trial court, considering the issues de novo. In re Cherokee Park Plat, 113 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12295 - 2005-03-31
the same methodology as the trial court, considering the issues de novo. In re Cherokee Park Plat, 113 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12295 - 2005-03-31
Estate of Steven M. Anderson v. Abraham J. Pellett
. The Estate appeals. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25586 - 2006-08-08
. The Estate appeals. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25586 - 2006-08-08